Kamloops group seeks water-protection order on mine site
A Kamloops community group opposed to mining firm KGHM’s proposed Ajax mine wants the Interior Health Authority to issue a protection order preventing possible water contamination from the facility on the argument an environmental assessment of the project was inadequate.
The University of Victoria Environmental Law Centre plans to file an application with the Kamloops Public Health Unit Monday requesting the unit’s drinking water officer issue a prevention order regarding potential hazards from the project on behalf of the Kamloops Area Preservation Association.
The environmental assessment “didn’t look at all the possible sources of contamination, didn’t look at all the possible pathways (for contaminants) to human beings and all the wells that are going to be impacted,” said Calvin Sanborn, the UVic ELC’s legal director, who is filing the application along with law student Anna Poezzhaeva.
Kamloops Area Preservation Association chairwoman Paula Pick said air and water quality “in all their complexities” are among the group’s biggest concerns.
“We just knew they didn’t do enough work looking at the risks to drinking water,” Pick said. “And I don’t even think they knew how many people are dependent” on two community wells mentioned in the report.
Sanborn argued at the very least the water-protection officer could “order an operation not to take place until an absolutely comprehensive (environmental) assessment is done.”
The proposal is for a $1.3-billion open-pit copper-gold mine on 17 square kilometres within the southern limits of Kamloops’ municipal boundaries, a couple kilometres from residential neighbourhoods.
Operations would involve carving 65,000 tonnes of rock per day out of the ground to produce some 64,000 tonnes of copper and 130,000 ounces of gold over a 23-year mine life.
Ajax has gone through a joint review by the B.C. Environment Assessment Office and Canadian Environmental Assessment Authority, which issued a draft report Aug. 1 that concluded the project “is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects to surface water,” or groundwater, if KGHM follows promised mitigation measures.
The joint federal, provincial report on Ajax is open for public comment until Oct. 10, with a decision to come after that, but Sanborn characterized the project “on the cusp of approval.”
The UVic ELC application is an attempt to get authorities to consider the findings of its expert, hydrologist Gilles Wendling, whose report contends the environmental assessment didn’t consider the cumulative effects of potential contaminants on water, didn’t consider run-off as a potential source of contamination in a nearby creek and didn’t consider seasonal fluctuations in concentrations of potential contaminants that could flow from the site.