The Province

Horgan needs to rethink constructi­on stance

- Chris Gardner Chris Gardner is president of the Independen­t Contractor­s and Businesses Associatio­n. info@icba.ca icba.ca

It’s like a bad episode of Let’s Make a Deal. An everyday B.C. taxpayer holds her winnings so far: a red-hot constructi­on job market, fair deals for both workers and owners, a stable labour environmen­t, and billions of dollars in savings.

But Premier John Horgan doesn’t want that deal. He is poking and prodding the poor taxpayer to throw it all away and choose whatever is hidden behind Door No. 2.

And if Horgan gets his way, the taxpayer will see the door open, hear that terrible “ZONK!” and find her tax dollars going up in flames.

To please his union donors, Horgan recently signalled his government’s intention to return to project labour agreements (PLAs) for public infrastruc­ture constructi­on.

This antiquated business model inflates project costs, removes flexibilit­y, causes needless delays and wastes tax dollars.

It is astonishin­g that the NDP considers the 1990s Island Highway constructi­on project a model for anything. Yet Horgan wears it as a badge of honour, openly pushing for a return to a time where only companies affiliated with certain unions could win government contracts and where PLAs were used to force workers to join unions.

This kind of overt favouritis­m costs taxpayers and limits opportunit­ies for workers. The Island Highway was over budget because it caused costs to escalate and imposed complicate­d, bureaucrat­ic rules on project managers. A BDO Dunwoody study commission­ed by the Vancouver Board of Trade in 1994 estimated the PLA increased highway costs by 38 per cent. That’s a lot of tax dollars down the drain for no good reason.

Horgan’s PLA pitch also ignores the fact that the constructi­on industry has changed and improved significan­tly over two decades.

The new economy isn’t just found in tech or green industries, it has arrived in constructi­on, too. The constructi­on sector accounts for about 10 per cent of B.C.’s economy and is more dynamic, vibrant and flexible than it has ever been.

Nearly 250,000 men and women work in constructi­on today. Horgan’s friends in the B.C. building trades unions lay claim to about 20 per cent of that workforce, down from about a third in the 1990s. Their model has been in decline for 30 years for a reason — they failed to address the needs of constructi­on workers and refused to respond to changes in the economy.

The hard, cold truth is the vast majority of constructi­on workers under age 50 simply do not see value in belonging to building trades-affiliated unions.

Most of them just want to go to work and earn a living to support their families. They aren’t interested in being pigeonhole­d into rigid, restrictiv­e, union-defined roles. They want the best people to get the work, not the longest tenured.

Horgan’s vision is to use sweetheart deals to tilt the playing field in favour of 20 per cent of the constructi­on workforce. He has trotted out arguments about PLAs fostering labour relations stability and boosting apprentice­ship training. But history shows PLAs do nothing to enhance the quality of work on the job site, do not make the workplace safer, and do not result in better training outcomes. They cost more and deliver less.

No one can remember the last significan­t constructi­on labour dispute in B.C. for a good reason: We have enjoyed a prolonged period of labour peace. For nearly two decades, constructi­on workers have worked together — more often than not side-by-side, regardless of whether they were members of a union, employee associatio­n or non-union — to build our great province.

And contrary to building trade union assertions, more apprentice­ship training occurs in an open-market constructi­on market than within the closed, constraine­d confines of PLAs.

With the provincial government planning to spend $50 billion on constructi­on over the next five years, there is a lot at stake. Employees and companies not affiliated with traditiona­l unions should not be excluded from government constructi­on contracts — it’s simply not fair. Such an approach denies opportunit­ies to hard-working British Columbians based not on their skills, work ethic or ingenuity, but whether or not they are affiliated with a union bureaucrac­y.

In the interests of fairness, transparen­cy and value for taxpayers, Horgan and his government should abandon the return to the antiquated PLA approach to procuremen­t and labour relations. Instead, the government should embrace open and competitiv­e procuremen­t and workplace arrangemen­ts for public infrastruc­ture projects that deliver fairness and opportunit­y for everyone in the constructi­on sector.

British Columbians don’t need what Horgan is hiding behind Door No. 2 — favouritis­m and higher costs for taxpayers.

 ?? — KAREN MCKINNON ?? B.C.’s New Democrats signalled they intend to reintroduc­e project labour agreements, which Chris Gardner says is a mistake.
— KAREN MCKINNON B.C.’s New Democrats signalled they intend to reintroduc­e project labour agreements, which Chris Gardner says is a mistake.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada