The Province

Rams expose Seahawks’ decline

Younger, hungrier L.A. team outhustled Seattle’s mini-dynasty that’s unravellin­g

- Ed Willes ewilles@postmedia.com

It happens in the fight game.

A great champion hangs around for one last title fight against a younger, hungrier opponent, believing he still has one more great performanc­e to give. He has experience on his side. He has a winners’ pedigree. But he quickly finds out those intangible­s are no match for the speed and power of youth.

The resulting humiliatio­n is difficult to watch as the proud champ stands there, taking shot after shot. Afterwards, they’ll say the cumulative effect of all those battles caught up to him, that he got old in one night.

So tell us. Is that what happened to the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday? And take your time answering that one because it seems Todd Gurley scored another touchdown while we were posing the question.

“It’s the first time we’ve ever,” said Seahawks quarterbac­k Russell Wilson, his voice trailing off. “They beat us pretty good today.”

Before Sunday, in fact, the Seahawks had never been beaten by more than seven at home in the six years of the Wilson-Pete Carroll era. Then the Los Angeles Rams came to town and throttled them 42-7.

“I wasn’t happy with anything,” said Carroll. “There was nothing about this game. We avoided getting shut out. We got a touchdown. But, no, there was nothing to be happy about. That was really a dismal performanc­e by us.”

And one that seemed to mark the end of an era.

In a showdown for first place in the NFC West, the Seahawks were bludgeoned unmerciful­ly by the younger, hungrier, faster, more powerful Rams in front of 69,077 stunned fans at CenturyLin­k Field. The win left the Rams in first place in the division and dropped the Seahawks below the playoff bar at 8-6. But its deeper significan­ce went far beyond the standings and the Seahawks’ playoff hopes this year.

This game was billed as the last stand for the Seahawks’ greatest team ever, a mini-dynasty which won 56 regular-season games, a Super Bowl and came within seconds of winning another. But the core of that team has slowly been eroded by time, injuries and the laws of competitio­n and, Sunday, the worst fears of this franchise’s loyal following were realized in a three-hour nightmare.

In the game’s first seven minutes, the Seahawks fumbled, took three penalties, surrendere­d two sacks and had their best offensive play nullified by a video challenge. And then things got a lot worse. Trailing just 6-0 after their horrendous start the Seahawks’ defence surrendere­d four straight touchdowns over a 20-minute stretch that was interrupte­d only with the end of the first half. Rams running back Gurley, who had himself a Hall of Fame game, scored three of those majors, the final on a 57-yard burst with 51 seconds left in the second quarter. That run came on a thirdand-20 after the Seahawks had called a timeout.

We’d add that Gurley, who finished with 152 rushing yards and four touchdowns in, yeesh, three quarters of work, wasn’t touched on the play but why bother.

Gurley, mind you, wasn’t the Seahawks’ only problem. The defence, led by defensive Player-of-the-Year candidate Aaron Donald sacked Russell Wilson seven times, hit him on nine other occasions and forced two Wilson fumbles. Pharoh Cooper had punt returns of 53, 26 and 26 yards and finished with 180 return yards. Quarterbac­k Jared Goff threw for just 120 yards, then again that’s about all the Rams needed because they ran for 244 yards.

“It’s really hard for me to explain to you because this is something I have seen us do and play that far off,” said Carroll. “But the running game was really the issue.”

The Seahawks, meanwhile, took nine penalties for 60 yards and accumulate­d just 149 yards in net offence. Doug Baldwin, their leading receiver, caught one pass for six yards. Tight end Jimmy Graham caught one pass for minus-one yard.

“It just seemed like everything went wrong,” said tight end Luke Willson who caught a touchdown pass in the second half which at least averted a shutout. “There wasn’t one thing we could do right today. “

“That’s not the kind of defence you want to become one-dimensiona­l against,” said offensive tackle Duane Brown. “We were in two-minute drill throughout the game and they were pinning their ears back.”

It didn’t help that the Seahawks’ defence was without injured All-Pros Richard Sherman, Kam Chancellor, Cliff Avril and K.J. Wright and middle linebacker Bobby Wagner, the guts of the unit, was essentiall­y playing on one leg before he left in the second half.

“Hats off to the guys who played but I don’t think they should have played,” said safety Earl Thomas, the one remaining link to the glory days. “Normally you see Wags going sideline to sideline making plays and he couldn’t do it today.”

The Seahawks now face the Cowboys in Dallas and the Arizona Cardinals at home over their final two games and 10 wins might get them into the playoffs. That, predictabl­y, was the focus of most of their postgame commentary but the more lasting impression to emerge from Sunday’s loss had little to do with this season’s playoff race and everything to do with the future of this team.

“Obviously. it was an embarrassi­ng game,” said Baldwin. “We didn’t play Seahawks football. We have to remember this feeling, come back tomorrow and get ready for Dallas.

“It’s the only way to grow. You have to let it burn, remember that feeling and that emotion. We can’t waste this. This loss can’t be in vain.”

Oh they’ll remember this one in Seattle, all right, but not for the reasons Baldwin was talking about.

 ?? — GETTY IMAGES ?? Los Angeles Rams running back Todd Gurley celebrates his 57-yard touchdown with Robert Woods Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks at CenturyLin­k Field. The Rams won 42-7 in what Seahawks coach Pete Carroll called ‘a dismal performanc­e by us.’
— GETTY IMAGES Los Angeles Rams running back Todd Gurley celebrates his 57-yard touchdown with Robert Woods Sunday against the Seattle Seahawks at CenturyLin­k Field. The Rams won 42-7 in what Seahawks coach Pete Carroll called ‘a dismal performanc­e by us.’
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada