The Province

Heyman under fire for dinner with activists

Liberals question environmen­t minister’s meeting with pipeline opponents

- NICK EAGLAND neagland@postmedia.com twitter.com/nickeaglan­d

The B.C. Liberals are questionin­g whether the province’s environmen­t minister shared informatio­n about the NDP government’s opposition to the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion in a way that swung the stock market.

The province announced on Jan. 30 that it would limit the amount of diluted bitumen that can be transporte­d by pipeline or rail until it can do further research on spill cleanup. That same day, Environmen­t Minister George Heyman ate dinner with a “Kinder Morgan Strategy Group” at a two-day retreat on Bowen Island, which was attended by opponents of the $7.4-billion Trans Mountain project.

Prince George-Valemount MLA Shirley Bond questioned Heyman about the meeting at the B.C. Legislatur­e on Feb. 15. Concerns again surfaced on Monday, when Kamloops-North Thompson MLA Peter Milobar asked Heyman who else was at the dinner and whether any of them were lobbyists.

“I attended a dinner. I attended a question-and-answer period. I did not attend a strategy session,” Heyman responded.

Heyman recalled speaking with environmen­talist Tzeporah Berman as well as Karen Mahon and Sven Biggs of environmen­tal group Stand.earth and Squamish councillor Khelsilem Rivers, but said he did not wish to provide an incorrect complete list of attendees and would look at his records. He said it was not “the responsibi­lity of government to ensure that people we meet with are registered as lobbyists.”

Milobar pressed Heyman for transparen­cy on the issue.

“This is quite serious,” Milobar said. “This was a dinner on the same night that the trade war with Alberta was triggered by statements made by the minister of environmen­t.”

Surrey-White Rock Liberal MLA Tracy Redies said Monday that on the day of the minister’s announceme­nt, Kinder Morgan shares dropped by $800 million — which a dinner attendee celebrated in an email, she added.

“For a government minister to work with a third party whose goal is to negatively impact the share price of a publicly traded company — it’s completely inappropri­ate,” Redies said. “These groups had press releases already drafted and ready to send out immediatel­y after the environmen­t minister’s announceme­nt.”

In an emailed statement, the Ministry of Environmen­t said the government had given a “courtesy notificati­on” about its plans to study and review the pipeline project to several non-profits, business groups and other levels of government.

“This is a normal part of government’s interactio­ns with organizati­ons, and regularly took place under the previous government as well,” the statement said.

The ministry did not give a copy of the notificati­on before deadline.

In an emailed reply to questions, spokesman David Karn said the notificati­on was provided on the afternoon and evening of Jan. 29 to 28 organizati­ons including the B.C. Business Council, Canadian Associatio­n of Petroleum Producers, Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs, the David Suzuki Foundation, Dogwood and Sierra Club.

The ministry said proposed regulatory changes aren’t considered market-moving data and pointed to an ongoing correction in energy stocks driven by increased U.S. shale production.

 ?? — CP FILES ?? GEORGE HEYMAN
— CP FILES GEORGE HEYMAN

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada