It doesn’t pay to expect the worst
Holding negative expectations about the future is nothing new. Writing more than 150 years ago, Thomas Hardy claimed having a pessimistic outlook meant you could “never lose.” Evidently, he once said it was the only view of life that guaranteed you would never be disappointed.
The evidence, however, challenges Hardy’s view.
Margaret Marshall at Seattle Pacific University and Jonathon Brown at the University of Washington recruited 81 Washington undergraduates and asked them to classify themselves “optimistic” or “pessimistic.”
They then gave the participants a series of moderately difficult word-association puzzles. Afterward, they asked everyone to predict how well — or otherwise — they thought they had done.
Next, they gave the participants a second set of puzzles. Half were handed much easier word associations this time, so as a result they did better than they expected. The rest of the volunteers were given a set of extremely difficult puzzles, so they failed to meet their expectations.
Everyone was then asked to rate how they felt about their results. The pessimists felt worse when they received poor results than did those optimists who also did badly, but who had expected to do well.
Anticipating the worst, it seems, completely failed to cushion the blow when expectations weren’t met.
A team of researchers led by Sarit Golub of Hunter College, at Harvard University, weighed up the overall consequences for undergraduates who expected either a favourable or an unfavourable test outcome. In a series of both laboratory and field studies, they found that participants who expected to do well felt better while waiting for their results than those who expected to do badly. However, on receiving their results, the optimists who did badly felt no worse than the pessimists — who also did poorly. Overall, therefore, the optimists fared better.