Arresting 3,000 protesters not practical or warranted
Re: Social distancing at protests
It’s a good thing that letter-writer David Stuart is not in charge of the Vancouver Police Department. According to him, the 3,000 peaceful protesters at the Vancouver Art Gallery on Sunday “should have been arrested.” The alleged crime that the protesters were committing — “no social distancing.” Stuart resents that his health and that of others was put at risk. “The police did nothing.” Was the writer at the peaceful protest? I was. Some protesters were within six feet of each other, but the crowd was spread out.
If these peaceful protesters really were criminals, how do you arrest 3,000 people? How many police officers would that take? They would have to be hauled to jail to get fingerprinted and mug shots taken, put into cells, or released on bail with a promise to appear in court. Then when the court dates come up, they will all plead not guilty. Would that be the best use of our police and court resources?
Perry Lamarche, Vancouver
Liquor stores not essential
Re: Addiction is the real disease of isolation
Your letter writer’s stats on alcohol consumption and its increasing abuse during the pandemic is frightening. As a former heavy drinker, I can understand how some might seek solace from the stresses of dealing with our new lifestyles. However, as she says, it can lead to a lifelong struggle with addiction.
Our “guiding light” of a government declares liquor stores an essential service. Really? Essential to whom? Only those already under alcohol’s grasp, and that club will increase exponentially in the next while.
Grant Husdon, Salmon Arm
Another view on face masks
A recent letter suggests that health officials have turned themselves into pretzels explaining the need for masks. I see it differently. At the onset of the pandemic, recommendations focused on hand washing, not touching your face and social distancing. The latter included staying at home.
I recall that there was an availability issue for face masks.
Furthermore, the non-surgical mask offered then provided no protection to the wearer. As restrictions ease, I understand that social distancing can be compromised and that masks can protect others from me, while I get protection when others wear them. Also, they are now more available.
Dennis Rankin, Surrey
Boomers not at protests
Dear Black Lives Matter protesters, please don’t take the lack of participation of baby boomers etc. as a lack of support for your cause. Unfortunately, there is a pandemic loose upon the world.
We have been told that it is more likely that an elderly person will contract the virus than a younger person, and should therefore avoid large groups of people.
We are afraid to attend a protest where many people don’t even bother with face masks. Just know that we believe in your fight against racism and are with you in spirit.
We will do what we can in other ways. We can donate to organizations supporting you or write letters to our government representatives. Black Lives Matter, and we the elderly are with you!
Wendy Whalen, Surrey