Awards show gets serious
NEW YORK — The Golden Globes have always been the less serious stop en route to the Academy Awards — the boozy, bubbly awards show put on by a little-known group with sometimes confounding taste. But this year, a funny thing has happened: The Golden Globes mean something.
The 75th Golden Globes, to be presented in Beverly Hills, Calif., on Sunday night, will be the most prominent and public display yet for the MeToo movement that has swept through Hollywood and left a trail of disgraced men in its wake. Out of solidarity with the victims of sexual harassment and assault, many women have said they will be dressing in black for the Globes.
“That will be really powerful,” Allison Janney, a supporting actress nominee for the Tonya Harding tale I, Tonya, said earlier this week. “I will be in a black dress and be proud to be standing there with the other actresses.”
The Globes have traditionally been a celebration, a good time and, frequently, a punchline. But they have had their political high points as well, like last year’s speech by Meryl Streep, the Cecil B. DeMille recipient for lifetime achievement. She spoke against U.S. President Donald Trump, who the next morning responded that Streep was “overrated.”
This year’s recipient is Oprah Winfrey, who earlier called the fallout following the allegations against Harvey Weinstein “a watershed moment” for women.
Winfrey is among the hundreds of women in the entertainment industry who have banded together to form Time’s Up, an initiative to advocate for gender equality among studio and talent agency executives. It has also created a $14 million legal fund for victims of sexual harassment.
Time’s Up — whose members include many Globes attendees, including Reese Witherspoon, Gal Gadot and Emma Stone — unveiled itself Monday with full-page newspaper ads. But already there is fresh fodder for its cause. The University of Southern California’s Annenberg Inclusion Initiative released its latest findings Thursday on diversity in directing. By examining the top 100 films of 2017 in box office, researchers found that just 7.3 per cent of the movies were directed by women. That’s an increase from 4.2 per cent the year before, but still below the decade-ago high point.
That lack of change will be on display Sunday, too, where five men will compete for best director despite several potential nominees in Greta Gerwig (Lady Bird), Dee Rees (Mudbound) and Patty Jenkins (Wonder Woman). Still, the Globes are starting to see some of the same criticisms on diversity that have trailed the Academy Awards in recent years. But unlike the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, which has revamped its 6,000plus membership to make its ranks more inclusive, the same pressure hasn’t been applied on the Hollywood Foreign Press Association.
But the HFPA’s quirks have drawn increased scrutiny, including this year’s oversight of one of 2017s most acclaimed comedies, Kumail Nanjiani and Emily Gordon’s interracial rom-com The Big Sick. Also snubbed was Girls Trip breakout star Tiffany Haddish. And then there’s the choice to slot in Jordan Peele’s Get Out as a comedy, for the film and star Daniel Kaluuya. That provoked the Globes’ largest backlash.
All of the turmoil could make Seth Meyers’ hosting gig a little trickier. Meyers follows Jimmy Fallon, whose Globes broadcast last year was watched by 20 million viewers, an eight per cent increase.
“We don’t want this night to be a session where we’re just scolding everything that happened because it is really important for us to remember that great movies came out of this year,” Meyers said in an interview. “A lot of people, we’re realizing, worked really hard in environments that were not that conducive to working really hard. So the goal is to have people have a wonderful night and an enjoyable party in a year which everyone deserves it.”
But this year, many in Hollywood are wondering if they deserve something more than a party.