The Standard (St. Catharines)

Fortuitous timing for secrecy award

-

Timing is everything in life, politics included.

And this adage couldn’t be more applicable than to the questionab­le distinctio­n awarded to Niagara Region on Monday in downtown St. Catharines by a quartet of national journalism and free expression organizati­ons.

During the morning news conference, Jim Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression (CFE) at Ryerson University, announced Niagara Region is the national winner of the annual “Code of Silence” award for “outstandin­g achievemen­t in government secrecy.”

Jointly given by the CFE, the Canadian Associatio­n for Journalist­s, News Media Canada and Canadian Journalist­s for Free Expression, the award couldn’t have gone to a more deserving government­al organizati­on. The awards jury, which comprised representa­tives of the four press-freedom advocacy groups, recognized the regional municipali­ty with this citation:

“Regional Municipali­ty of Niagara wins the 2018 Code of Silence Award for Outstandin­g Achievemen­t in Government Secrecy for delaying or denying FOI requests and forcing lengthy and expensive appeal processes, as well as refusing to communicat­e with local media on issues of public interest. Extensive coverage by Grant LaFleche, reporter for St. Catharines newspaper The Standard, exposes secrecy around council members’ expenses and refusals to speak on high profile public issues, as well as requests from several council members to fire The Standard’s management and replace them with those more compliant with Regional Municipali­ty of Niagara’s wants.

“This past year has seen Regional Municipali­ty of Niagara as the subject of two Ontario Ombudsman investigat­ions: the first, for an unlawful seizure of a reporter’s notes at a council meeting, and most recently, suspicions of a tainted hiring process for a high paying chief administra­tive officer job.”

“In a democracy, the public has a right to know,” said Turk. “It has a right to expect transparen­cy from its public institutio­ns. We have access to informatio­n laws to ensure that, but those laws are inadequate.

“We hope to shine as bright a spotlight as possible on government agencies that fail in their responsibi­lity to the public.”

In Niagara’s case, the council expenses issue stands out. The Standard reported extensivel­y on the issue in the past year finding councillor­s were billing taxpayers for pricey dinners, charitable donations and trips to Toronto to appear on radio programs.

After initially opening up and posting expense claim details on the regional website, the approach was changed early in 2018. The Region still publishes expenses online, but the data is stripped of receipts and other documentat­ion that would provide understand­ing of what is being claimed and whether or not it is appropriat­e. To access that informatio­n, the Region requires news media and residents to file a freedom of informatio­n request.

Senior leaders at the Region regularly refuse to answer questions on sensitive issues, such as Regional Chair Alan Caslin’s ongoing refusal to discuss his expenses. Regional leaders have tried behind the scenes to have senior management at Niagara’s daily news replaced, among other attempts to manipulate news coverage and what reaches the public ear.

Indeed, as this term of council has progressed, the lack of transparen­cy has increasing­ly worsened. Ratepayers in Niagara deserve better.

And that’s why the timing of this award is fortuitous. With less than a week to go until this year’s municipal election, the award is a reminder to Niagara voters about what is at stake on Monday, Oct. 22.

More of the same opaque, unaccounta­ble, back-room dealing leadership? Or should we be voting for those who will open the shutters at regional headquarte­rs and allow the taxpayers to see what they’re paying for?

It’s your choice.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada