The Standard (St. Catharines)

Like it or not, history favours Donald Trump being re-elected

- THOMAS KLASSEN Thomas Klassen is a professor in the School of Public Policy and Administra­tion at York University in Toronto

If political science and history are guides, Donald Trump will be re-elected president regardless of events during the remaining days of the campaign. Americans almost never eject a party from the White House after only four years and rarely reject a president after one term.

The Republican­s, once having gained the presidency, have invariably kept it for at least two consecutiv­e terms since the late 19th century. George H.W. Bush was the only one-term Republican president in well over 100, but he followed immediatel­y after eight years of a fellow Republican in power, Ronald Reagan.

The presidency of Jimmy Carter is the only one in over a century that a party, either the Democrats or Republican­s, held the White House for only a single four-year term.

Historical­ly, the Democrats have done best with young candidates: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and John Kennedy.

They fare less well with older and more establishe­d candidates such as Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Alternativ­ely, Republicat­ions enjoy more success with older candidates, such as Reagan.

Presidents running for a second term nearly always gain more votes than during their first successful run for the office. The only exception in modern times is Obama who garnered fewer votes during his second campaign.

History strikingly illustrate­s how reluctant American voters are to turf a president after a single term. This conservati­sm stems from three sources: the division of powers in Washington, a term limit and the federal nature of the U.S.

First, unlike elected leaders in many other countries, U.S. presidents are severely constraine­d in their domestic power notwithsta­nding the rhetoric of Trump. The president heads the executive or administra­tive branch of government. That is, the branch responsibl­e for implementi­ng or executing the decisions made by Congress.

In many nations, especially those with parliament­ary systems of governance, the head of the executive branch is also the head of the legislativ­e branch. This person — like the Prime Minister of Canada — has both legislativ­e and executive power due to support from one or more political parties in the legislatur­e.

In Washington, presidents must battle the power held by Congress, which itself is split into two bodies, the Senate and the House of Representa­tives, that are often at odds with each other and in which party discipline is weak. Much of the work of presidents is to find common ground with senators and members of the House of Representa­tives while avoiding impeachmen­t. The legacy of a peacetime president is based by how successful he was in cajoling Congress to support and fund his proposals and initiative­s.

Second, presidents are constraine­d by the 22nd amendment to the U.S. Constituti­on passed in 1951 that prevents anyone being elected to the office more than twice. Given this limitation, voters know a second term will be the last one, unlike the situation in countries like Germany where Angela Merkel is in her 15th year of rule.

Third, considerab­le power is held by the 50 state government­s as demonstrat­ed by the diverse responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. As such, any president will regularly encounter formidable organized opposition from large states such as California, New York, Florida and Texas.

The result of the division of powers, the term limit and authority of individual states is that presidents have limited ability to do great long-term harm or immense long-term good. Therefore, it makes sense that Americans at the ballot box feel most comfortabl­e with the adage: better the devil you know than the devil you don’t.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada