The Standard (St. Catharines)

‘We should be coming down on (businesses) like a ton of bricks’

Ontario must take more action on workplace outbreaks, experts urge

- HOLLY MCKENZIE-SUTTER

As Ontario struggles to beat back a dire wave of COVID-19, workplace spread has been singled out by public health experts, mayors and top health officials as a major source of infections.

Experts and workers say government measures so far haven’t directly targeted the issue, but fairly simple practices would help track and reduce infections.

Epidemiolo­gist Colin Furness at the University of Toronto’s Dalla Lana School of Public Health said there should be clear consequenc­es for employers that don’t take proper precaution­s at this point in the pandemic.

“We know from contact tracing data and outbreak investigat­ions what some of the most risky environmen­ts are. We should be coming down on them like a ton of bricks,” Furness said.

Hundreds of people have been infected in recent outbreaks linked to workplaces, including at least 121 workers at a Canada Post facility whose cases were reported this week and more than 140 people at a Cargillown­ed meat processing facility in Guelph last month.

Hundreds of migrant workers tested positive on Ontario farms last summer, and more than 5,000 long-term-care staff have been infected to date.

But observers said there isn’t consistenc­y when it comes to penalties for employers, or even naming workplaces where outbreaks happen.

Traditiona­lly, workplaces have been challengin­g for public health because harsh enforcemen­t might mean future issues are covered up, Furness said.

There are some signs of change, however, led by Toronto Public Health. The health unit said this month it would name employers with significan­t outbreaks and enforce reporting of cases among workers, a move Furness called “revolution­ary.”

Putting pressure on employers is also important to make sure other measures are effective, Furness said, including paid sick leave, which has become a prominent political issue in Ontario. Mayors from province’s largest cities have been calling for months for accessible, universal paid sick leave so workers don’t come to work sick over fear of losing income — an argument supported nearly universall­y by public health experts.

Janice Mills, who has a job in auto manufactur­ing, said sick leave is the biggest issue at the Glencoe, Ont., plant where she works with about 50 other people per shift.

Workers can apply for the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit introduced to support people missing work over a COVID-19 diagnosis or exposure, but they’re only eligible if they miss 50 per cent of the work week.

That’s an issue for hourly workers at Mills’ plant, she said, because if someone falls ill on Thursday or Friday, they can’t make use of the benefit until the following week.

“That’s very difficult for people to wrap their heads around,” Mills said.

Labour Minister Monte Mcnaughton said Ontario isn’t looking to implement its own sick leave policy because there are still millions of dollars available through the federal benefit.

He said the program is sufficient, but workers may not know about it, and he’s asking federal ministers to ensure there isn’t a delay in getting money out to people.

“I feel strongly that we shouldn’t duplicate this program,” he said in an interview.

Furness said sick leave is important, but it doesn’t guarantee workers won’t face repercussi­ons for accessing it — so employers should be held accountabl­e if people are pressured into working while sick.

Tim Sly, an emeritus professor of epidemiolo­gy at Ryerson University, pointed to regular asymptomat­ic testing as another key measure that would help assess workplace spread.

He noted other regions have made use of rapid tests to find the virus among people who may not know they’re infected, but Ontario has until recently been reluctant to introduce the practice.

“Why we’ve delayed it so often, I have not a clue,” he said. “It costs so little, it’s easy to do, and if you repeat it, you’re getting up to really good standards of screening.”

Some industries in Ontario, such as film and television production, are already regularly testing employees for COVID-19, and the government plans to ramp up asymptomat­ic testing in the coming months by sending rapid tests to hardhit sectors like farms, manufactur­ing and long-term care.

Mcnaughton said an asymptomat­ic testing pilot has already begun on constructi­on sites in the Greater Toronto Area, and he said there will be “huge emphasis” on testing workers going forward.

He also pointed to the government’s recent “inspection blitz” of big-box stores, which is expanding to more industries. Most fines have been relatively small, at less than $1,000 per infraction, but Mcnaughton said some larger investigat­ions are underway, and employers should be aware of the potential for fines up to $1.5 million.

“I hope my message was clear to every big corporatio­n out there, every shareholde­r, that if they’re not having a safe work environmen­t for their workers, and for customers, I won’t hesitate to shut them down,” he said.

 ?? CHRISTINA RYAN
TORSTAR FILE PHOTO ?? Employees pass through security at a Cargill plant in High River, Alta., in May. More than 140 people tested positive for COVID-19 at a Cargill-owned facility in Guelph last month.
CHRISTINA RYAN TORSTAR FILE PHOTO Employees pass through security at a Cargill plant in High River, Alta., in May. More than 140 people tested positive for COVID-19 at a Cargill-owned facility in Guelph last month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada