The Telegram (St. John's)

N.L. politician­s obliged to be petro-puppets

- Russell Wangersky

Well, it’s oil and gas show time again, and like every year, the provincial government has joined the petro-chorus.

The Noia 2018 oil and gas conference was this past week, and, like most years, it’s a convention of the like-minded.

And because it’s all the same song, the media tends to echo the one note it hears: “It takes too long for projects to get underway,” “The regulation­s are too complex,” “Developmen­t is handcuffed.”

Oh, and the always popular, “Super-massive mega oilfield just on the horizon.”

You don’t hear much about the carbon footprint of oil developmen­t, or the greenhouse gas emissions of offshore installati­ons. There aren’t panel discussion on the need for new environmen­tal oversight to protect seabirds, or examining the effects of seismic testing.

Premier Dwight Ball echoed the “oil’s well that pays well” tone on Tuesday, saying that oil developmen­t here faces a “very exhaustive, complicate­d, long and enduring regulatory regime.”

Not to worry, though: “We are dedicated to creating an environmen­t of success, for this province, and for industry partners alike.”

He’s not the only provincial cheerleade­r.

“We’re faced with challenges that are man-made. They’re self-inflicted,” said Nalcor oil and gas vice-president Jim Keating. He pointed to delays of up to three years for some projects, saying, “It’s off the chart in terms of being a noncompeti­tive situation.”

It’s a regular message, and one the provincial government doesn’t just talk about.

Last February, the province announced it wanted to change regulation­s to speed up and expand offshore developmen­t.

You can understand hearing it from oil executives. But why are provincial politician­s and officials so clearly on board, especially because they have a role in regulating the offshore?

And should we take the province’s involvemen­t with a grain of salt?

We should — and not just because the provincial government needs oil money so badly that it’s essentiall­y complicit. (On that front, the provincial government’s delight in new fields borders on the celebrator­y tone of a drug addict being handed their next fix.)

We should take it with a grain of salt because the province is not only a partner in several oil projects, but also contractua­lly bound to side with, and support, the oil companies.

Look, for example, at the Hebron developmen­t agreement, signed with great flourish by then-premier Danny Williams, Kathy Dunderdale and Ed Martin.

The provincial government has guaranteed its support to the oil companies involved in a variety of ways: the province agreed to “assist and support each of the proponents in seeking modificati­on for federal fiscal enhancemen­ts,” for example.

But pay careful attention to clauses 5.1 B and C. “5.1— Support of Province. “The Province shall, on the request of the Proponents … (B) use all reasonable efforts to assist the Proponents in securing commitment­s from Canada and municipal government­s in the Province regarding the legal and regulatory framework applicable to a Developmen­t Project; and (C) support the efforts of the Proponents in responding to any future legislativ­e and regulatory changes that may be proposed by Canada or a municipal government in the Province that might adversely affect any Developmen­t Project, provided such action does not negatively impact the Province or require the Province to take any legislativ­e or regulatory action respecting municipali­ties.”

In other words, the oil companies didn’t just get a provincial partner to share in the costs and benefits of oil developmen­t. They also got a pet cheerleade­r, ready to speak up against any regulatory or legislativ­e changes that the oil companies might not like, and to “use all reasonable efforts” to support those same oil companies in getting legislativ­e changes the oil companies want.

So, keep in mind, the provincial government’s support is more than the obvious necessity of a steady flow of petrodolla­rs to keep the government afloat.

It’s a contractua­l obligation. And it’s a contractua­l obligation that we should keep in mind absolutely every single time we hear a provincial politician or official saying they want faster regulation for oil projects, or, worse still, provincial regulation of oil projects.

It would be perfectly safe and environmen­tally friendly, I’m sure, to have the fox fast-tracking approvals for the regulation of chickens.

Russell Wangersky’s column appears in 39 Saltwire newspapers and websites in Atlantic Canada. He can be reached at russell.wangersky@thetelegra­m.com — Twitter: @wangersky.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada