The corporate climb
Stalled progress for women in Canadian C-suites
None of Canada’s TSX 60 companies were headed by a woman and two-thirds did not include a single woman among top earners during their latest fiscal year, reveals a Canadian Press analysis of corporate Canada’s highest ranks.
Despite pressure to improve gender equality in Canadian workplaces - and a myriad of initiatives and corporate pledges to boost female representation - top-earning women continue to be paid less than their male counterparts, while the number holding the powerful management roles of chief executive officer and chief financial officer has shrunk compared to five years ago.
Among the companies on the TSX 60 index, a crosssection of the largest and most heavily-traded Canadian stocks, none listed a woman as its chief executive officer in its most recent compensation disclosure. Just three had a woman as CFO. That compared to one CEO and eight CFOS in 2012.
Less than eight per cent of the top paid management roles were held by women.
Only 25 women were among a total of 312 named executive officers (NEO) - defined by regulators as a company’s most highly compensated roles - in the latest management information circulars of TSX 60 companies, which, like all Canadian public firms, are required to disclose a list of NEOS each year.
The findings on NEO compensation include salaries as well as other forms of compensation such as share-based awards, incentive plans and pensions.
The Canadian Press analysis paints a bleak picture of a corporate landscape in which women remain a significant minority, and those in the upper ranks are paid an average 64 cents for every dollar earned by the average male NEO.
That’s even more dismal than the average of 74 cents for every dollar of annual salary made by men among the entire working population, according to the most recent Statistics Canada data.
Over the last year, the Me Too movement, which began as a reaction to allegations of sexual harassment and assault against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, has become the latest iteration of a longstanding drive for equality for women in the workplace.
Many women in corporate Canada are hopeful the recent attention has sparked a broader conversation that will expose the unseen barriers women face when climbing
the corporate ladder and fuel the push for gender parity, according to dozens of women in senior management roles and corporate governance experts who spoke to The Canadian Press.
“I can’t remember anything in the last 15 years that has sent such strong shock waves through corporate Canada,” said Charlene Ripley, general counsel and an executive vicepresident at mining company Goldcorp Inc.
“This Me Too movement has been a catalyst to shock people into awareness of so many issues, when it comes to bad
culture.”
And yet, the C-suite remains a domain largely occupied by men.
Two-thirds, or 40 of the TSX 60 index of influential companies, did not cite any women NEOS in 2017 disclosures. (Loblaws Companies Ltd. and parent George Weston Ltd. are both listed on the TSX 60, and both cite Sarah Davis, president of Loblaw, as an NEO.)
That figure is little changed from 2012 data, though the analysis of that year was limited to 59 firms because oil and gas heavyweight Nexen was delisted after being acquired and
did not put out an NEO list.
“I am surprised that there has been no movement,” said Janice Fukakusa, former chief administrative officer and chief financial officer of the Royal Bank of Canada and one of the few women on the list of NEOS.
“The only way you can increase participation is for women to look up and see themselves represented. So, this is not a good statistic for us.”
Over the past five years, 36 per cent, or 116 men who were deemed NEOS in 2012 were still on the influential list in 2017, while just six women remained in the elite group five years later, representing 30 per cent.
The eye-opening data suggests the efforts to accelerate gender diversity haven’t yielded the desired results, said Camilla Sutton, president and chief executive of Women in Capital Markets.
“If you took the pulse of the nation, in terms of the change that’s happened versus the change that the data suggests, I don’t think that would be correlated at all,” she reflected on the analysis.
“The data would suggest that we’ve gone backwards, on many measures.”