The Telegram (St. John's)

‘It seems like we are left behind’

Harvester says recent record-breaking oil and gas bid puts fishery to the wayside

- BY KYLE GREENHAM Fish harvester Heather Starkes.

It’s a record-breaking year for offshore oil and gas exploratio­n in Newfoundla­nd and Labrador, but the province’s fishery is greeting the news with serious concern.

Gander-based harvester Heather Starkes says it is a worrying sign for the fishery that $1.3 billion was successful­ly bid for new oil and gas activity, and that two of these bids are within marine refuge areas where fishing is restricted.

“When you hear these things over the news and announceme­nts like this coming from government, you see the fishery is certainly not at the forefront,” Starkes said. “It seems like we are left behind.”

Starkes has been fishing for over 39 years. She is chair of the shrimp committee and a working member for the turbot committee in the 3K/3L fishing zone. Working in these offshore fisheries, Starkes is disappoint­ed that areas off limit to her industry, in the name of conservati­on, are open to the oil and gas industry.

“These marine protected areas are in place for a reason. If you can’t fish there anymore, then why should they be able to go in and blast there for oil?” she said. “To me, there can’t be this double standard. If there’s a rule, policy or law in place, everyone should have to abide by it.”

The bids were awarded to the companies BHP Billiton Petroleum, Equinor, Suncor Energy and Husky Oil. Their work will total over one million hectares of offshore areas, in both the eastern Newfoundla­nd and Jeanne d’arc basin regions.

Recommenda­tions not taken With the prospect of marine protected areas and other fishing grounds being affected by these new oil and gas bids, the Fish, Food and Allied Workers (FFAW) union also expressed disappoint­ment with the recent announceme­nt.

The union was disappoint­ed that recommenda­tions provided to the federal government earlier this year for a standardiz­ed approach to marine protected areas were not implemente­d.

In September, the National Advisory Panel on MPA Standards released its report and recommenda­tions to the minister of Fisheries and Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard. The report called for a prohibitio­n on oil and gas exploratio­n and extraction in federal marine protected areas, and said the federal government should adopt internatio­nal standards for conservati­on to ensure all industries face the same restrictio­ns on marine protected areas.

According to an emailed response from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), the government is assessing the panel’s recommenda­tions, and the recently announced bids were not affected by the report.

“Oil, gas and seismic activity is continuing completely unrestrict­ed in these supposed protected areas,” FFAW president Keith Sullivan said in a news release.

Ensuring conservati­on goals continue Scott Simms, MP for Coast of Bayscentra­l-notre Dame Bay, says he understand­s the concerns being voiced by the FFAW and harvesters in his constituen­cy, and that any oil and gas exploratio­n done in a marine protected area should first ensure it will not interfere with conservati­on efforts.

“If a marine protected area is put in place to protect turbot, then any oil and gas exploratio­n in that areas needs to first prove, with a great deal of confidence, they will not affect that goal,” Simms said. “It’s my understand­ing that there are ways to do oil and gas exploratio­n that will not negatively affect marine protected areas or damage the overall ecosystem. The onus should be on the companies to show that any activity in these areas satisfies the goals of the marine protected area.”

Earlier this month, the offshore rig Searose caused the largest oil spill in the province’s history, with 250,000 litres of oil leaking into the ocean.

Simms acknowledg­ed there are always unforeseea­ble risks and the possibilit­y for accidents like oil spills that can negatively affect the ecosystem, but this alone should not prevent these oil and gas bids from going ahead.

“Accidents can happen, but we can’t just order all oil and gas exploratio­n out of the question because of that risk,” he said.

In an emailed response, the Canadanewf­oundland Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB), which announced the bids earlier this month, stated that protecting environmen­tally significan­t and sensitive areas is pivotal to its work. According to the email, in offshore oil activities the CNLOPB issues project-specific environmen­tal assessment­s, in accordance with the federal and provincial government Atlantic Accord Implementa­tion Acts.

The CNLOPB stated it plans to continue working with DFO, fishery groups and other agencies in support of Canada’s marine conservati­on goals.

While the exact extent of the activity and environmen­tal impact that will result from these exploratio­n bids has yet to be seen, harvesters like Starkes hope sacrifices made by the province’s fishery do not prove futile because of this recordbrea­king push for more offshore oil.

“I think our provincial government needs to take a better look at the concerns of fishermen. We need to have a voice,” Starkes said. “The people in the oil and gas industry want a livelihood and it’s the same with the fishery. We want young people interested in the industry, but in order to have that, there has to be a fishery there for them.”

In light of the announceme­nt, Starkes hopes more pressure will be put on the government to ensure the fishery is of higher concern in future oil and gas exploratio­n.

 ?? SALTWIRE NETWORK FILE PHOTO ??
SALTWIRE NETWORK FILE PHOTO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada