The Telegram (St. John's)

Auditor general to investigat­e wetland capping failure

- DAVID MAHER THE TELEGRAM david.maher@thetelegra­m.com

Progressiv­e Conservati­ve Leader Ches Crosbie says he's pleased to see the House of Assembly direct the auditor general investigat­e the bungling of wetland capping at the Muskrat Falls reservoir.

Crosbie wrote a letter to the Public Accounts Committee in August with a request to investigat­e what led to a failure by the provincial government to cap the wetlands at the Muskrat Falls reservoir.

The Independen­t Expert Advisory Committee establishe­d in 2016 had agreed that capping wetlands near the Muskrat Falls reservoir should go ahead to help mitigate the effects of methylmerc­ury in the reservoir. The government had committed $30 million to the project. Nalcor Energy had amended a permit to allow the wetland capping to take place, but then-environmen­t Minister Andrew Parsons failed to give the directive to have the wetlands capped.

The $30 million allotted for the capping was instead divided up and offered to three indigenous groups. The Nunatukavu­t Community Council and Innu Nation took the money, but the Nunatisavu­t government still has not accepted the money.

The Public Accounts Committee is comprised of PCS Kevin Parsons (chair) and Tony Wakeham; Liberals Derrick Bragg, Pam Parsons, Scott Reid, and Sarah Stoodley; and NDP MHA Jim Dinn. The committee voted unanimousl­y to direct Auditor General Julia Mullaley to investigat­e what led to the failure. The vote was only a directive. Mullaley has not yet clarified whether an investigat­ion will follow the vote.

"There's a great mystery which the government has done little or nothing to shed light on as to how they could enter a process which took years, the process by which the government agreed with indigenous groups to get protesters off the worksite of the Muskrat Falls dam. It was entered into in good faith. There was scientific personnel on it, as well as community representa­tion," he said.

"They arrive at a conclusion that was acceptable to all, which was the wetland capping part to minimize the contaminat­ion of Lake Melville by methylmerc­ury. Everyone thought that was agreed to, signed, sealed and delivered."

Muskrat Falls Inquiry Commission­er Richard Leblanc said during hearings he was "confounded" by the failure, and noted a lack of explanatio­n as to precisely why the wetlands were not capped by the government.

In a release, Nunatsiavu­t President Johannes Lampe says his government is encouraged by the move toward investigat­ion.

"We have always maintained that the province had no intention whatsoever to cap the wetlands, despite setting aside up to $30 million to do so,” Lampe stated in a news release.

“All we were told is that time simply ran out, that doing the work would have had a negligible impact on methylmerc­ury production in the reservoir and the Lake Melville ecosystem. We have never accepted those claims. We still maintain the work could have been done prior to impoundmen­t, and that the claim suggesting capping would have only prevented just a two per cent rise in methylmerc­ury is unfounded and incorrect.”

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D PHOTO ?? An aerial photo of the Muskrat Falls hydroelect­ric dam project in central Labrador in 2018.
CONTRIBUTE­D PHOTO An aerial photo of the Muskrat Falls hydroelect­ric dam project in central Labrador in 2018.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada