The Walrus

Editor’s Letter

- — Jessica Johnson

As someone who works primarily with non-fiction writers and editors, I’m often asked how I edit fiction. I always say it’s the same way you edit non-fiction — just look for pacing, voice, and structure. The truth is, I probably edit non-fiction the way I edit fiction, because fiction editing was the first and the most intensive kind of editing I was taught as a student in the University of British Columbia’s creative-writing program. When I read a submission, I look for whether a story makes sense to itself. Does the reader have the informatio­n they need — no more, no less? Does the writing make you want to keep reading, or does it feel like work? A lot of drafts are great for the first few pages but then just peter out as if the writer had an idea for a scene or character but wasn’t sure what to do with it. Profession­al writers often say that the short story is the hardest literary form. It is also a genre in which Canadians, not just the Nobel Prize–winning Alice Munro, are prolific. At The Walrus, we publish ten short stories in print a year, with an acceptance rate of less than 3 percent. We receive submission­s via agents and publishers but also regularly find new voices in our general inbox, fiction@thewalrus.ca. One of the hardest things about editing fiction at The Walrus is rejecting it. In my two years here, I have found that many of the stories we receive aren’t that far off. It would be easier to decide what to accept if the submission­s were all long shots, inappropri­ate genres from writers who just found us on the internet. In fact, most of our submission­s are from published writers who know the magazine well; a lot of stories are already 60– 80 percent there. My job is to find the ones that can make it to 100 percent. When we find a story that I think could speak to a wide audience, I usually ask the writer for a phone call. A lot of writers are surprised, and not just because fiction writing can be lonely, solitary work. There are few general-interest magazines that still publish literary fiction, and even fewer of them edit the way we do: over a series of conversati­ons and with a fact-check. On the call, I might talk to the writer about what I think is missing from the story or explain where I was confused. This is where fiction editing most departs from working on non-fiction. I’ll ask questions like: Is this story set on a different planet? Does your main character have super powers? Is he or she dead and communicat­ing from the afterlife? The selections we do publish are the ones in which the writer is able to create a world. That is true of all of the stories in this summer reading issue. Mireille Silcoff’s realistic family drama “Upholstery” is set in Quebec’s Laurentian­s. Troy Sebastian’s “Tax niʔ pik̓ak (A Long Time Ago)” is set across time periods, interspers­ing Ktunaxa and English vocabulary. Awardwinni­ng writer Zsuzsi Gartner’s fable “The Second Coming of the Plants” describes a future in which humans are no longer the planet’s overlords. Zsuzsi was one of my first fiction teachers, and I still remember her giving us a handwritte­n chart depicting the different “story structures.” There was a triangle, a spiral, and, off in the corner, an indescriba­ble scribble just labelled, “genius model.” I always think of that when I remember the range of things — in style, in subject matter, in scope — a good story can be. The same is true, of course, of other forms of writing. In this issue, we have dedicated considerab­le space to an increasing­ly pressing concern: the environmen­t. Science writer Anne Casselman reports on an ambitious collaborat­ive audit of Canada’s efforts to address climate change — I think it’s the sexiest story you’ll read this summer about a bunch of bureaucrat­s (“Emissions: Impossible”). Josiah Neufeld describes the struggle of disparate groups over a pipeline project in his home province of Manitoba (“Crossing Lines”). Ethan Lou proposes a new growth area for the Alberta economy: Bitcoin mining (“Unnatural Resources”). And, in her “Extinction Sonnets,” poet Susan Glickman considers the final days of animals all over the world. Our annual summer reading issue is traditiona­lly one of the most popular editions of The Walrus. We hope you will enjoy this one. And if you are, like so many of us, a writer, please send thoughts and suggestion­s to letters@thewalrus.ca. B

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada