The Welland Tribune

Asylum seekers could be screened in Balkans, Africa

- LORNE COOK AND RAF CASERT

BRUSSELS — The idea of screening Europe-bound asylum-seekers in North Africa and the Balkans gained support from several European Union leaders Sunday as tensions over how best to handle new arrivals threatened to undermine the bloc’s unity.

At emergency talks in Brussels, a group of 16 countries led by France and Germany were thrashing out who should take responsibi­lity for the thousands of migrants landing primarily in Italy, Greece and Spain, how long they should take care of them and how much their European partners should do to help out.

Failure to agree on how to deal with the challenge of migration threatens the EU’s border-free travel area, one of the biggest accomplish­ments in the bloc’s 60-year history.

The number of people arriving in Europe has dropped significan­tly this year — the UN’s refugee agency forecasts around 80,000 people will enter by sea in 2018 if current trends continue — but the EU’s political turmoil over the topic has soared. Antimigran­t parties — and government­s in Hungary and Italy — have been fomenting public fears of foreigners and have won support doing so.

Encouraged by a deal with Turkey that has slashed migrant arrivals from there by 97 per cent since 2015 — when hundreds of thousands of people entered, mostly migrants fleeing war in Syria and Iraq — the 28-nation EU is ready to green light plans to set up screening centres in Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, Niger and Tunisia.

Plans to set up migrant reception centres in Albania are also under discussion.

French President Emmanuel Macron said “the method that we are going to adopt” would involve “working together vis-à-vis the countries of transit and origin outside the European Union.” He mentioned Libya — the main jumping off point for countries bound for Europe — other African countries and the Balkans.

Noting that migrant arrivals have dropped significan­tly, Macron said: “it’s a political crisis that Europe and the European Union is mostly living today.”

The prime ministers of Denmark, Belgium and Luxembourg also backed the idea of outsourcin­g the effort to tame migration, although they emphasized the need to respect internatio­nal law.

The Internatio­nal Organizati­on for Migration and the UNHCR are cautious about setting up “hot spots” outside of Europe to filter people fleeing violence at home from those trying to get to the continent to improve their lives economical­ly. No country has so far agreed to host any screening centres, according to the EU’s top migration official.

It’s also unclear how much the effort would cost, but the EUTurkey deal has so far cost more than 3 billion euros (US$3.5 billion).

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is battling a domestic political crisis with her coalition partners over migration, played down hopes that a full EU summit starting on Thursday will clinch any comprehens­ive agreement on how to deal with migration.

Merkel instead is pushing for bilateral and trilateral deals to cope with short-term migration pressures. EU nations, Merkel said, have to see “how can we help each other without always having to wait for all 28, but by thinking what’s important to whom.”

“It is also about bi- and trilateral agreements for mutual benefit,” she said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada