The Welland Tribune

India struggles to breathe

Air pollution has become the ‘new tobacco,’ WHO director general says in op-ed

- KAI SCHULTZ, JEFFREY GETTLEMAN, HARI KUMAR AND AYESHA VENKATARAM­AN

NEW DELHI — A toxic fog is creeping over New Delhi. Children trudge to school with plastic masks strapped to their faces. Sports events are cancelled. Eyes burn. Throats itch. Chests heave.

It’s the dreaded pollution season in India, when the amount of vehicle fumes, dust and smoke from agricultur­al fires spikes to levels so high that experts say children breathing this air could suffer permanent brain damage.

Agra. Lucknow. Varanasi. New Delhi. India’s most fabled cities are now among the world’s most polluted. According to some recent rankings, India holds nine of the top 10 spots. In a sign of how many people — especially the elite — are distressed about this, shops in Delhi now sell “pollution guard” sunscreen and shampoo.

Toxic air has become a global menace that kills seven million people each year, the United Nations Environmen­t Program said in a bleak report released Tuesday. The bulk of these deaths are in the Asia Pacific region, it said.

This week the World Health Organizati­on is holding what it bills as the first global conference on air pollution and health at its headquarte­rs in Geneva.

Air pollution has become the “new tobacco,” WHO director general, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu­s, wrote in an op-ed last week. “The world has turned the corner on tobacco,” he wrote. “Now it must do the same for the ‘new tobacco’: the toxic air that billions breathe.”

In its new report, the UN Environmen­t Program outlined 25 measures that could easily reduce air pollution (which also contribute­s to climate change). One tactic: stopping the burning of agricultur­al waste like the countless farm fires sweeping across northern India right now.

While data from across India shows that hazardous air pollution continues to rise, progress is being made. The central government, for the first time, is spending more than US$150 million to dissuade farmers from burning their fields.

Take the village of Bishanpur Channa, in the northern state of Punjab. Every November, for as long as anybody can remember, Bishanpur Channa’s farmers burned driedup rice stalks to clear the land for the next season’s wheat crop.

The sky became so sooty that the afternoons resembled evenings. The smoke drifted nearly 200 miles southeast, blanketing New Delhi. Dalbir Singh Kaleka, a farmer with a snowwhite beard, said he and his neighbours put up with the discomfort because burning was cheap and easy. “We all did it,” he said.

But this November could be different. Kaleka and his fellow farmers have been buffeted with public service messages, including a new hit song, “Don’t Burn the Stubble Brother, Don’t Burn.”

More persuasive, perhaps, is the $156-million chunk the Indian government has set aside for subsidizin­g alternativ­es to crop burning, such as renting big steel machines that push the excess rice stalks into the ground to act as a natural fertilizer.

This year, Kaleka said he and many of his neighbours were trying to burn as little as possible. “Look, I do not want to pollute,” he said. “My son tells me, ‘Even if you lose money, we should save India’s image.’”

Clearly, Indian government agencies are capable of taking bold steps. Beyond the subsidies in Punjab, this month authoritie­s shut down the last coal plant near New Delhi, and they have rerouted traffic and banned some dirty fuel sources.

But Indian environmen­talists say their government is lost. At the same time it passes some measures to cut pollution, it passes others that fling open the doors to dirty air.

This year, the central government proposed removing environmen­tal clearances for constructi­on projects up to about 540,000 square feet, more than doubling the previous threshold. Dust from such projects is a major polluter; the new policies would surely create more.

Like many developing countries, India is walking a precarious line, trying to spur infrastruc­ture, industry and economic growth, all of which take their toll on the environmen­t. Unlike in China, where a communist government has responded to its own toxic air by slapping criminal charges on polluters, India’s political system is much freer and messier — a sprawling democracy that often shies away from using the stick.

Last week, when a group of civil servants and environmen­talists took a tour of West Delhi, they found constructi­on sites managed by government agencies among the most flagrant polluters. At a new subway station, the overseers had not even put up proper barriers or sprinkled water to keep the dust down.

“They are taking the undue advantage of being government organizati­ons,” said V. Selvarajan, secretary of Green Circle, a group that works on environmen­tal issues.

The subway system was ordered to pay a fine of around $7,000.

In the coming weeks, air pollution here is expected to hit a choking peak. Winter will slow down the winds, meaning that still air and cooler temperatur­es will trap the soot and smoke that rises up from India’scrowded, growing cities.

The air in Mumbai, India’s seaside commercial capital with some 20 million residents, is also getting worse. With two smoggy months still to go, average annual concentrat­ions of PM 2.5 shot up nearly 50 per cent in the last three years.

Experts blame a mix of factors, including Mumbai’s thickening traffic, noxious gases from landfill fires, constructi­on dust and emissions from coal plants in the suburbs. A few local groups are trying to put pressure on the government to get serious, but they say the authoritie­s are clueless.

“They’re trying to build more vertical roads, coastal roads, increase car traffic and put less emphasis on public transport,” said Ashok Datar, chair of the Mumbai Environmen­tal Social Network. “It’s like we’re investing in emission.”

India’s Supreme Court routinely steps in, like in a recent order restrictin­g firecracke­r usage during the coming Diwali holiday. Its orders are not quite ignored, but they aren’t vigorously enforced, either.

In Punjab, home to several million farmers, thousands of pounds of carbon dioxide have typically been released into the air every burning season.

But this year, there is reason for hope, said S.S. Matharu, a government engineer working for the Punjab Pollution Control Board. In just two years, Matharu said, the number of fires dropped by nearly 70 per cent after stiff fines, advances in farming technology, and aggressive outreach in villages and on social media, including the catchy new song.

“The motherland has birds and other living creatures to feed,” the song goes, “don’t burn rice straw to choke them to death.”

‘‘

“It’s like we’re investing in emission.”

ASHOK DATAR

Mumbai Environmen­tal Social

Network

 ?? ALTAF QADRI
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ??
ALTAF QADRI THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
 ?? PRABHJOT GILL
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Commuters make their way through smoke caused by farmers burning crop stubble on the outskirts of Amritsar, Punjab state, India.
PRABHJOT GILL THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Commuters make their way through smoke caused by farmers burning crop stubble on the outskirts of Amritsar, Punjab state, India.
 ?? REBECCA CONWAY
NYT ??
REBECCA CONWAY NYT
 ?? ALTAF QADRI THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Shoppers walk in a market, wearing face masks to fight the pollution, in New Delhi. Bottom left: Nikhil Gupta, left, an environmen­tal engineer, holds a clinic to raise awareness about the effects on air quality of burning stubble in the village of Dhablan.
ALTAF QADRI THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Shoppers walk in a market, wearing face masks to fight the pollution, in New Delhi. Bottom left: Nikhil Gupta, left, an environmen­tal engineer, holds a clinic to raise awareness about the effects on air quality of burning stubble in the village of Dhablan.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada