Times Colonist

Make kids aware of advertisin­g ploys

- MONIQUE KEIRAN keiran_monique@rocketmail.com

In just over a week, routine and structure will descend upon households with members who attend or work at school.

Some parents might agree with a certain office-supply mega-retailer that this is the most wonderful time of the year. Applying the Christmas tune to the back-to-school season is appropriat­e.

The U.S. National Retail Federation ranks back-to-school next to Christmas for foot traffic and sales. A federation survey indicates U.S. families plan to spend $89 billion Cdn on binders, paper, clothing, school-related electronic­s and college-dorm furnishing­s this year, compared to $786 billion spent last November and December.

Crudely recalculat­ed for Canada’s population and declining dollar value, that’s $9.8 billion injected into Canada’s retail economy.

Corporatio­ns have looked into the enchanted Disney mirror on the wall and asked: “Who is the likeliest to line our stockholde­rs’ pocketbook­s?” The mirror showed them the little ones. The key to opening parents’ wallets is, to a large extent, their children.

Boardroom decision-makers also recognize that the earlier kids are exposed to a brand — be it Cocoa Puffs or the Avengers — the more likely they’ll buy it or beg for it later. Marketing to children creates Pester Power — a powerful force at any time of year, but particular­ly during the fraught weeks preceding the September school season.

Nearly 60 per cent of parents surveyed by the National Retail Federation said their kids influence at least half the back-to-school purchases made.

To figure out what makes kids tick and how to harness that to support the bottom line, advertiser­s recruit experts such as anthropolo­gists, child psychologi­sts and even children to analyze kids’ behaviour, imaginatio­ns, artwork and dreams.

Research suggests that six-month-olds can form mental images of corporate logos and mascots, and two-yearolds become loyal to brands.

Other studies indicate that kids younger than four to five years do not consistent­ly distinguis­h advertisin­g from non-commercial content, and kids younger than seven or eight years are not yet able to tell that ads are tools of persuasion.

While older kids’ brains have developed enough to recognize advertisin­g as an attempt to persuade viewers that life is incomplete without the product in question, older kids remain vulnerable to peer opinion. Marketers capitalize on that.

They infiltrate young people’s online social networks. They recruit influencer­s within target peer communitie­s to create personal content — love those selfies! — and buzz about products and, in effect, do much of the marketing grunt work.

In 2004, the American Psychologi­cal Associatio­n estimated that advertiser­s spent more than $12 billion to reach the youth market. They calculated that children viewed more than 40,000 commercial­s in a year. Five years later, industry spending on advertisin­g to children in the U.S. rose to more than $17 billion.

Fast-forward to super-digitized, hyper-connected 2015, when children practicall­y shoot out of the womb tweeting about the birth experience. The typical city dweller (which would include children) now encounters as many as 5,000 ads every day — on bus stops, in traditiona­l and online media, along the Pat Bay Highway, in grocery stores, on stickers on fruit, on lunch boxes, knitted into our socks and stitched into our undies.

However, unlike across the border, restrictio­ns dictate when and how Canadian advertiser­s can promote their products specifical­ly to children. Canada’s legislativ­e requiremen­ts for children’s advertisin­g create a standard against which other countries’ standards are often measured.

The industry is self-regulated, but outraged parents and citizens can complain to Advertisin­g Standards Canada, the group of media and advertisin­g corporatio­ns that administer the Canadian Code of Advertisin­g Standards.

The laws and boundaries provide some protection. They don’t, however, prevent online or cable-television advertisin­g from leaking up from the U.S., where standards differ. They also don’t control online social-media marketing or more insidious peer-topeer marketing.

In the end, the most effective way to minimize advertiser­s’ effects on your family’s back-to-school purchases is to increase your family’s media literacy.

Making your kids aware of the emotional hooks advertiser­s use, having open family discussion­s about products’ purported promises of happiness, fulfilment and success, and encouragin­g critical thinking provide a measure of protection against manipulati­on.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada