Times Colonist

Conservati­ves can’t play well with others

-

Re: “Why proportion­al representa­tion is a bad idea,” comment, Aug. 9.

I saw the headline and immediatel­y looked to the author’s informatio­n and noted the connection to the Fraser Institute. That says it all: a conservati­ve thinktank.

With the Conservati­ves actively campaignin­g for a referendum on electoral reform, I’m not surprised to see support documentat­ion such as this being circulated to media. And the argument follows recent Conservati­ve hot buttons by fearmonger­ing (fringe parties could exert influence!) and fiscal prudence (“countries with PR election rules tend not only to spend more”).

What is unsaid — given the Conservati­ves’ demonstrat­ed inability to “play well with others” — is the need for co-operation amongst elected representa­tives in PR government­s. That point is the root of Conservati­ve concerns about electoral reform: the loss of influence they will experience when surrounded by more progressiv­es.

The Liberals, NDP and Greens all campaigned in the recent federal election on a platform that included electoral reform, and together they received 67 per cent of the votes. The committee examining electoral reform is a reflection of the future. All parties are represente­d and working together — except for the Conservati­ves, who are dragging their knuckles.

Fran Wallace Victoria

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada