Federal response urged in wake of rising number of asylum claims
OTTAWA — The Immigration and Refugee Board is doing its best to cope with a growing number of asylum claims in Canada, but the federal Liberals must take action as well before an unmanageable backlog gets created, the head of the IRB says.
The rapid pace of the increase in new claims sees the board — an independent tribunal that decides on immigration and refugee cases in Canada — potentially on track to receive 30,000 claims this year — triple the number lodged before it just four years ago.
“There is a limit to what you can do,” said IRB chairman Mario Dion of his agency’s efforts.
“Efficiency has increased significantly, but there is no way we can deal with 30,000 cases when we’re funded for about 17,000.”
While the public eye is on the pressures being created by people crossing illegally into Canada, claims before the IRB began rising in earnest in the past six months.
The board now anticipates their backlog could hit 30,000 cases this year and average wait times will increase by up to eight months, the board said in a report published late last week.
They are working to manage it. Beginning in April, the IRB will start redeploying staff to split their time between backlog cases and new ones, and will fast-track what it defines as straight forward claims, among other things. While they have government funding for 94 people to decide claims, the IRB dug into its own pockets to hire about three dozen more.
But now Dion is waiting on whether a plan he put before the immigration minister months ago makes its way into next week’s federal budget.
He said he’s hoping for legislative change.
The Conservatives moved in 2012 to address high intake levels and backlogs at the IRB by overhauling the refugee system. Among other things, they implemented an approach that differentiated claimants based on their country of origin and legislated deadlines for those claims to be decided.
New claims lodged in Canada dropped from 20,141 in 2012 to 10,227 in 2013, and the backlog did come down, but other elements of the plan didn’t work as intended.
For example, while people from designated countries of origin were supposed to have their cases heard faster than people from elsewhere, it didn’t happen routinely. Short timelines made it harder to gather all the information required to hear the case, a recent internal evaluation into the program found.
If the DCO system was dropped, Dion said, things would be better.
The government had promised action on the DCO system but a spokesperson for Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen would only say “work is ongoing” when asked about the status of the DCO review.