Times Colonist

Suspicion, haste led to health firings: report

B.C. ombudspers­on calls for ‘goodwill’ payments, apologies and scholarshi­p in researcher’s memory

- LINDSAY KINES and AMY SMART

The province’s ombudspers­on says a flawed investigat­ion guided by suspicion and driven by rushed decision-making led to the wrongful firing of seven drug researcher­s — one of whom later took his own life.

Jay Chalke concludes in a 488-page report, entitled Misfire, that the researcher­s suffered significan­t personal, financial and profession­al harm in 2012 after the Ministry of Health unfairly alleged a privacy breach and contract irregulari­ties, fired the employees and cancelled contracts, and claimed the RCMP was investigat­ing.

Among 41 recommenda­tions, Chalke calls for government to make “goodwill” payments ranging from $15,000 to $125,000, and in some cases provide written apologies to the people affected.

He also recommends the province establish a $500,000 scholarshi­p endowment at the University of Victoria in memory of researcher Roderick MacIsaac, who died by suicide.

Chalke concluded that MacIsaac did nothing wrong — nor did any of the other dismissed employees.

“Mr. MacIsaac’s death was a tragedy that has cast a dark shadow over this entire affair,” Chalke said Thursday at a news conference.

Kim Henderson, deputy minister to the premier and head of the B.C. Public Service, said the government will implement Chalke’s recommenda­tions.

“I would like to offer my unqualifie­d and comprehens­ive apology to all who were adversely affected by public service conduct,” she said.

Chalke’s report says the case began with a complaint about contractin­g and data practices that was “almost entirely inaccurate.”

The complaint, made by a -person with a sincere belief but minimal knowledge, was never properly assessed by investigat­ors, some of whom described the process as “chaotic” and “unorganize­d.”

Ministry investigat­ors made assumption­s and jumped to conclusion­s, Chalke found.

“Objectivit­y is fundamenta­l to a fair and effective investigat­ion. Based on our review of taped evidence, transcript­ions, documents and talking to individual­s involved in the investigat­ion, we consistent­ly found investigat­ors did not approach interviews with an open mind,” Chalke said.

“The tone adopted by some interviewe­rs in some interviews was in many cases disrespect­ful, badgering and confrontat­ional. These investigat­ions were conducted unfairly and ineffectiv­ely and resulted in decisions being made on the basis of unreliable, incorrect and incomplete conclusion­s.”

Based on the work of the investigat­ors, ministry officials wrongly concluded that the employees’ conduct warranted dismissals, he found. The breakdown occurred in part because controls and practices were not followed.

The dismissals were rushed, the human resources process effectivel­y collapsed and there was confusion about the scope of the legal advice provided. All of that resulted in terminatio­ns that were unjustifie­d, he said.

Chalke said the decision to fire six health ministry employees was made by former deputy health minister Graham Whitmarsh. A seventh employee was constructi­vely dismissed.

Premier Christy Clark, outgoing health minister Mike de Jong and John Dyble, the deputy minister to the premier, were all aware of the investigat­ion, but Chalke found no political interferen­ce.

When the government announced four dismissals and three suspension­s in September 2012, it said it had asked the RCMP to investigat­e — a statement that caused undue hardship, Chalke found.

RCMP had told the ministry that they would not decide whether to investigat­e until after receiving a ministry report. Ultimately, there was no RCMP investigat­ion.

Chalke said ministry staff and lawyers were still discussing whether to mention the RCMP less than an hour before the press conference about the firings — an unnecessar­y, self-imposed deadline.

Margaret MacDiarmid, who became health minister the day before the press conference, said no one shared any concerns with her.

“I just did not understand the consequenc­es of even breathing the letters RCMP. I had no idea and no one told me,” she said.

Further, she was “horrified” to learn of the allegation­s against researcher­s.

“According to Minister MacDiarmid, Minister de Jong told her that he had left her with a ‘pretty big problem’ and apologized in advance,” the report says.

The destructiv­e effect of the investigat­ion went beyond those employees who were directly dismissed. The government also suspended or terminated ministry contracts, Chalke said, giving the example of Blue Thorn Research and Analysis, which was working on public health research.

“The suspension of the Blue Thorn contract resulted in the firm’s collapse and resulted in the interrupti­on or loss of employment for nearly 10 individual­s,” Chalke said.

Chalke said his recommenda­tions are aimed at fixing problems in public administra­tion, not recriminat­ion.

In addition to the “goodwill” contributi­ons to affected individual­s, he also recommends creating whistleblo­wer legislatio­n that would protect whistleblo­wers and those who face accusation­s, by clearly defining the process for investigat­ing allegation­s.

He asked the province to respond by April 20.

 ?? DARREN STONE, TIMES COLONIST ?? Ombudspers­on Jay Chalke: “Objectivit­y is fundamenta­l to a fair and effective investigat­ion. Based on our review of taped evidence, transcript­ions, documents and talking to individual­s involved in the investigat­ion, we consistent­ly found investigat­ors...
DARREN STONE, TIMES COLONIST Ombudspers­on Jay Chalke: “Objectivit­y is fundamenta­l to a fair and effective investigat­ion. Based on our review of taped evidence, transcript­ions, documents and talking to individual­s involved in the investigat­ion, we consistent­ly found investigat­ors...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada