Former Trump aide Flynn suspected of breaking law in taking Russian money
House oversight committee also questions ex-national security adviser’s ties to Turkey
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, appeared to violate U.S. federal law when he failed to seek permission or inform the U.S. government about accepting tens of thousands of dollars from Russian organizations after a trip there in 2015, leaders of a House of Representatives oversight committee said Tuesday.
The congressmen also raised new questions about fees Flynn received as part of $530,000 US in consulting work his company performed for a businessman tied to Turkey’s government.
The bipartisan accusations that Flynn might have broken the law come as his foreign contacts are being examined by other congressional committees as part of investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and potential ties between Trump associates and the Kremlin. Congress returned this week from its spring recess, and Tuesday’s announcements reflected renewed interest on Capitol Hill.
Representatives Jason Chaffetz, a Republican, and Elijah Cummings, a Democrat, said they saw no evidence that Flynn, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant general, properly disclosed foreign payments he received to military officials or on his security clearance paperwork. Flynn, who headed the military’s top intelligence agency, was Trump’s national security adviser until he was fired in February.
Among the payments in question was more than $33,000 that Flynn received in 2015 from the Russia Today television network, which has been described by U.S. intelligence officials as a propaganda front for Russia’s government.
“That money needs to be recovered,” said Chaffetz, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. “You simply cannot take money from Russia, Turkey or anybody else.”
Cummings said Flynn’s failure to formally report the Russian payments on his security clearance paperwork amounted to concealment of the money, which could be prosecuted as a felony. Chaffetz said Flynn was obligated to request permission from both the Defence and State departments about prospective foreign government payments.
“There was nothing in the data to show that Gen. Flynn complied with the law,” Chaffetz said.
Flynn’s attorney, Robert Kelner, said Flynn reported his plans to travel to Russia to his former agency, the Defence Intelligence Agency, and he briefed officials there after he returned. Kelner declined to answer questions about whether Flynn properly disclosed the payments.
The congressmen spoke after seeing classified documents regarding Flynn provided by his former agency, the Defence Intelligence Agency. They were also briefed by agency officials.
The congressmen refused to describe in detail the materials they reviewed. But Cummings said the documents were “extremely troubling” and he urged the administration to declassify them.
Chaffetz and Cummings said they planned to write to the comptroller of the army and the Defence Department’s inspector general for a final determination as to whether Flynn broke the law and whether the government needs to pursue criminal charges and seek to recover the payments Flynn received.
Cummings also criticized the White House for refusing to turn over documents the committee requested about Flynn’s foreign contacts during his three-week stint as national security adviser.