Times Colonist

The Circle floats lots of ideas, but has too many holes

The Circle Where: Cineplex Odeon Victoria, Cineplex Odeon Westshore, SilverCity Starring: Emma Watson, Tom Hanks, John Boyega, Patton Oswalt, Bill Paxton, Karen Gillan, Ellar Coltrane Directed by: James Ponsoldt Parental advisory: PG Rating: Two stars out

- KATIE WALSH

Dystopian tech drama The Circle capitalize­s on the exploding role of technology in our lives, seeking to capture the zeitgeist while grappling with the heavy-duty issues of the day. It’s a noble, if failed, effort, because ultimately, the film is all buzzwords and no substance.

The film is based on Dave Eggers’ novel and Eggers himself adapted the book for the screen with director James Ponsoldt. Ponsoldt’s previous films have been intimate two-handers, from the alcoholism drama Smashed and high school romance The Spectacula­r Now, to the excellent David Foster Wallace biopic The End of the Tour. As we discover in The Circle, there have been glitches in scaling up. There are too few characters and they’re all poorly establishe­d, sketchy ciphers and stereotype­s, lacking depth and nuance.

The story follows a young woman, Mae (Emma Watson), who lands her dream job at tech giant The Circle, which is behind the social networking site TruYou. As she soon discovers, things are a lot more complicate­d than no-strings-attached parties and perks.

Much of the problem with The Circle is with the character of Mae. She’s never establishe­d as a fully formed person, so she becomes an empty vessel for the ideas of whomever she’s around. If she’s interactin­g with Circle leader Eamon (Tom Hanks), she’s passionate about disrupting the national voting system with social media. Then, suddenly, she’s upset about the lack of regulation and the nefarious collection of personal data while chatting with pal Annie (Karen Gillan) or secretive TruYou founder Ty (John Boyega).

The Circle is essentiall­y an episode of HBO’s biting tech satire Silicon Valley, just without the humour. Gags about tech culture aren’t played for laughs, but with dead seriousnes­s.

An interview sequence in which Mae is grilled about “Paul or John,” “Sonic or Mario” is a cringewort­hy attempt at capturing the hipster nerd culture of the Valley. A scene in which a pair of eager staffers force Mae to set up her social profiles while urging 100 per cent “participat­ion” and “communicat­ion” is far more sinister than humorous. Cultish behaviour echoes throughout, especially during Eamon’s “Dream Friday” talks, at which mobs of employees chant and shout “sharing is caring” back at their leader.

However, in establishi­ng Mae as the moral and philosophi­cal centre through which we are supposed to experience the privacy obliterati­ng tactics of The Circle, we’re liable to get whiplash from her rapidly changing outlook. She proselytiz­es the “accountabi­lity” and “knowledge” of transparen­cy, but is simultaneo­usly troubled by the effect it has on her personal life. Her character’s changing beliefs are so choppily pieced together within the film that she becomes an untrustwor­thy protagonis­t.

With serious problems in the script and editing, The Circle is objectivel­y a bad movie. But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t some fascinatin­g ideas at play, and, at times, this dystopian tech cult drama is somewhat enjoyable.

The biggest problem, though, is that the film doesn’t know what it’s trying to say. Is the destructio­n of privacy good or evil? How does transparen­cy operate differentl­y for individual­s, corporatio­ns and government­s? Can the Internet mob be channelled into a force for good? The Circle floats all these ideas, then lets them drop with a thud. It is profoundly unsatisfyi­ng.

 ??  ?? Emma Watson in a scene from The Circle, based on the novel by Dave Eggers.
Emma Watson in a scene from The Circle, based on the novel by Dave Eggers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada