Times Colonist

Expel Meredith from Senate, ethics committee recommends

Pentecosta­l minister had sexual relationsh­ip with teen girl

- JOAN BRYDEN

OTTAWA — The Senate ethics committee has recommende­d that the upper house take the unpreceden­ted step of expelling disgraced Sen. Don Meredith for engaging in a sexual relationsh­ip with a teenage girl.

It’s now up to the full Senate, which has never expelled a member, to decide whether to accept or reject the recommenda­tion, which also calls on the chamber to declare Meredith’s seat vacant.

“He has brought disrepute to himself and to the institutio­n,” the committee said in a scathing report released Tuesday.

“Your committee is of the opinion that Sen. Meredith’s misconduct has demonstrat­ed that he is unfit to serve as a senator. His presence in the chamber would in itself discredit the institutio­n.

“No lesser sanction than expulsion would repair the harm he has done to the Senate.”

Meredith must be given five sitting days in which to respond to the report, should he wish, so a vote on his fate can’t occur before next Tuesday at the earliest.

Meredith’s lawyer, Bill Trudell, said the senator was with his family and had no immediate comment on the report. Meredith has a right to speak to the Senate and a right of final reply, and will decide in the next few days whether to exercise those options, he added in an interview.

Trudell said he’s troubled by aspects of the report, although he would not say what those were.

“What they call for is a unique, never-used-before power to expel,” Trudell said. “What they are saying is that there is no other alternativ­e — and that’s precedent-setting. I suggested there were alternativ­es.”

According to the report, Meredith’s lawyer proposed that the senator be suspended without pay for one or two years. But the committee concluded that “a suspension would reinstate only temporaril­y the Senate’s dignity and integrity, which would again be compromise­d when Sen. Meredith would resume his seat.”

The Senate has undisputed authority to suspend senators. It did so recently with senators Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Patrick Brazeau while they were under investigat­ion for allegedly filing fraudulent expense claims. Its power to expel is less clear. The committee accepted the legal opinion of the law clerk and parliament­ary counsel to the Senate that the Constituti­on confers on the upper house the same privileges enjoyed by the United Kingdom’s House of Commons. The U.K. Commons can permanentl­y eject a member.

Trudell said he was not in a position to comment on the legality of expulsion.

“Constituti­onal experts will want to weigh in, and I’m sure that the Senate itself will want to be satisfied that the work of the committee can be adopted,” he said.

The committee’s recommenda­tion follows an explosive report from Senate ethics officer Lyse Ricard this year.

She concluded that Meredith, a 52-year-old, married, Pentecosta­l minister, had failed to uphold the “highest standards of dignity inherent to the position of senator” and acted in a way that could damage the Senate itself.

According to Ricard, Meredith began a relationsh­ip with the girl when she was just 16. It progressed from flirtatiou­s online chats to fondling and sexually explicit live videos and, eventually, to sexual intercours­e — once shortly before the teen turned 18 and twice after. She also found that Meredith had abused his position as a senator to take advantage of the teen.

Meredith has called the affair a “moral failing,” but insists he did not have intercours­e with the girl until after she turned 18 and has rejected fellow senators’ nearuniver­sal demand that he resign.

Sen. Raynell Andreychuk, chair of the ethics committee, received a standing ovation from most senators after summarizin­g the report — a telling sign that Meredith’s fellow senators seem keen to force him out since he won’t go voluntaril­y.

Meredith has apologized to his family, his fellow senators, the woman in question — known only as Ms. M — and to all Canadians, hoping the contrition would be enough for him to hold on to his seat.

“As a human being, I made a grave error in judgment, in my interactio­ns. For that I am deeply sorry,” he said in a March interview with the Canadian Press.

But while the committee acknowledg­ed that Canadians would “undoubtedl­y be willing to accept that senators are human,” it found Meredith’s misconduct too egregious to excuse.

Moreover, the committee said it was troubled by the fact that Meredith has never acknowledg­ed that he “failed to uphold the dignity and public trust bestowed on him” or that his actions have damaged the institutio­n.

In addition to Ms. M case, Meredith is the subject of an investigat­ion by the Senate ethics officer for allegedly sexually harassing and bullying members of his staff.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Don Meredith could become the first member expelled from the Canadian Senate.
Don Meredith could become the first member expelled from the Canadian Senate.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada