Times Colonist

Choices to make over infection in sinuses

- DR. KEITH ROACH Email questions to ToYourGood Health@med.cornell.edu.

Dear Dr. Roach: After years of excessive nasal congestion and postnasal drip that frequently affected my speech, I had a pseudomona­s infection in my sinuses diagnosed.

I’ve had a balloon sinuplasty and two rounds of Cipro. My symptoms briefly improved after each treatment, but soon reverted to their previous condition. My ear, nose and throat doctor has advised that I have three options — live with it, get intravenou­s antibiotic­s or have surgery. None of these is appealing to me. I would like your opinion.

P.G. Your ENT doctor has the benefit of having examined you, so I’ll comment only on the three options (which make perfect sense to me). I don’t like the idea of leaving a chronic infection in the sinuses. Pseudomona­s is a dangerous bacterium. It is hard to kill, is resistant to many antibiotic­s and can be invasive through the bones of the sinus. So I would recommend treatment over just living with it.

Ciprofloxa­cin is the preferred, if not the only, oral antibiotic effective against pseudomona­s. However, it might not be effective and it certainly has downsides, including potentiall­y irreversib­le effects on the bones, soft tissues and nervous system.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion has recommende­d that it be used in sinus infections only when there are no other options. Intravenou­s antibiotic­s are then a reasonable option. This is done via a peripheral­ly inserted central catheter, which allows people to get IV antibiotic­s while at home.

Unfortunat­ely, most antibiotic­s effective against pseudomona­s must be given more than once daily, and the choice of agents should be guided by a culture. Still, a course of IV antibiotic­s would have a good chance of curing the infection. However, the infection may come back.

Surgery is likely to be effective, but it isn't guaranteed, nor does it solve the problem permanentl­y. Medical treatment is mandatory after sinus surgery.

I would look at the IV antibiotic­s as the less-invasive option, and it would be my recommenda­tion based on the limited informatio­n I have. I still would recognize that surgery may, ultimately, be needed to prevent recurrence­s.

Dear Dr. Roach: Would it be OK to take montelukas­t with an antihistam­ine?

S.H.

The combinatio­n of antihistam­ines (such as Claritin or Zyrtec) and montelukas­t (Singulair) is more effective than either alone and is commonly prescribed.

Dear Dr. Roach: I was pleased to read in a recent column that you continue to recommend against high sugar intake.

I was, however, disappoint­ed that you failed to quote the overwhelmi­ng evidence relating high and frequent sugar intake to increased dental decay. Dental caries (decay) is the “most prevalent chronic disease in both adults and children, even though it is largely preventabl­e” (U.S. National Institute of Dental and Craniofaci­al Research). Dental caries can not only lead to pain and suffering, but, in its acute forms of sepsis, even to death.

I feel as profession­als, both medical and dental, we should continue to remind consumers that the frequent intake of sugarsweet­ened food and beverages is bad for our teeth and that we should limit such consumptio­n — not only to a specific amount, but also limit the frequency of intake in order to give the saliva a chance to counteract the acidity created by the oral bacteria feeding off the sugars. Paul Warren, Doctor of Dental

Surgery Dr. Roach Writes: I thank Dr. Warren for writing. I was addressing the controvers­y of the effect of sugar on medical risk, such as heart disease. There is no controvers­y about the risk of sugar on dental health.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada