Battle over licence plate heads back into Nova Scotia court
HALIFAX — A legal battle over whether Nova Scotia violated the constitution when it ruled a man’s personalized licence plate was offensive to women is expected back in court with fresh arguments today.
Lorne Grabher had his licence plate with the text “GRABHER” — his last name — revoked last year after government officials agreed with a complainant that it was a “socially unacceptable slogan.”
Grabher’s lawyers say they’ll provide the Nova Scotia Supreme Court with an amended affidavit stating that the regulation is so vague that it violates the freedom of expression guarantee in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
His previous application argued that the provincial decision itself was unconstitutional, while the new motion goes after the law itself and claims its wording is imprecise.
“The restriction of a fundamental freedom … cannot be justified on the basis it ‘might be offensive.’ ‘Might be offensive’ provides certainty of law to neither the registrar nor the citizen,” says the legal document prepared by lawyers with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
“The requirement that laws be precise is fundamental to the rule of law and constitutionalism.”
John Carpay, a spokesman for the group, said in an interview that it’s absurd and arbitrary that an ordinary citizen’s last name should be determined to be offensive.
He said allowing the decision to stand would create wider dangers to guarantees of freedom of expression.
Grabher wants his name reinstated on the plate, and the 69-year-old has argued he shouldn’t face discrimination just because his name is unusual, adding that his family had used the plate for 27 years.
He has said his last name is a point of pride for his family and its AustrianGerman heritage.
Nova Scotia’s Justice Department was not available for comment.