Times Colonist

Study finds how men pick up wrong signals about consent

- ALISON BOWEN

Maybe a man believes a woman wants to have sex. But does that mean she wants to have sex with him?

This is a question at the heart of research gauging how college men consider sexual consent.

The study, published in the Journal of Interperso­nal Violence, examined what men think implies consent and in which scenarios they felt women expressed a desire to have sex.

Rush University assistant professor and co-author Ashton Lofgreen wanted to survey college men after realizing much research focused on victims’ actions.

“I wanted to shift that focus into, how are men construing sexual consent and how can we use that understand­ing to improve education and prevent sexual assault?” Lofgreen said.

She and her co-authors surveyed 145 heterosexu­al men attending southeaste­rn U.S. universiti­es. They presented each with six scenarios followed by questions about the described encounters.

The questions that followed the scenarios included asking whether the women signalled a willingnes­s to continue the physical encounter and whether they communicat­ed a willingnes­s for sex.

Lofgreen was interested to see whether nonverbal cues and context — knowing someone’s sexual history, revealing clothing — had an effect on a man’s understand­ing of consent. She found men often conflated their perception of a woman’s sexual desire with her consent for intimacy with them personally.

“If people seem like they want to have sex, they’re more likely to communicat­e willingnes­s to do that, but they are separate constructs,” said Lofgreen, a clinical psychologi­st at the Chicago-based university’s Road Home Program for military veterans.

The research is limited by its sample size, which was homogenous in age, ethnicity and socioecono­mic level. Also, because the scenarios had specific details, it is impossible to know what a man might infer or understand from a situation he’s in personally.

Something that stuck out to Lofgreen was that men who were more likely to think that women enjoy being overpowere­d or men should be aggressive were also more likely to think the women in the scenarios wanted to have sex.

Another key finding was that men might understand passivity to be a positive response.

“We found that, particular­ly in passive conditions, men with a higher rate of masculinit­y tended to view those situations as more consensual,” she said.

“Consent is a message of yes versus an absence of no.”

People with trauma histories, for example, are more likely to freeze in a sexual situation. Or someone who feels uncomforta­ble or doesn’t want to hurt someone’s feelings might respond passively, but have no desire to have sex.

At a time when high-profile men are apologizin­g amid sexual misconduct allegation­s, the research indicates, she said, that people others might not expect to cross boundaries might feel justified in certain scenarios.

 ??  ?? The research examined what verbal and nonverbal cues college men examined when considerin­g whether a woman wants to have sex.
The research examined what verbal and nonverbal cues college men examined when considerin­g whether a woman wants to have sex.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada