Media walk tightrope over misconduct claims
NEW YORK — Talk-show host Tavis Smiley isn’t just angry at PBS for firing him on sexual misconduct charges, but also about his depiction in the media.
Smiley believes that if he hadn’t talked publicly about romantic relationships with subordinates at his company, the behaviour that led to his downfall, the public would make little distinction between him and those who have been accused of sexual assault or rape.
Conflation of different forms of misbehaviour is one of the issues facing media organizations covering the fast-moving story of sexual misconduct that went into overdrive with investigations into Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein’s behaviour.
“The media is painting with too broad a brush,” Smiley said. “We have lost all sense of nuance and proportionality in how we cover these stories.”
Actor Matt Damon was torched for broaching the topic. He told ABC News that all accused men shouldn’t be lumped together because there’s a spectrum of behaviour. There’s a difference between a pat on the rear and child molestation, he said. “Both of those behaviours need to be confronted and eradicated without question, but they shouldn’t be conflated, right?” he said.
Actor Minnie Driver called Damon tone-deaf. Another actor, Alyssa Milano, who began a cultural movement by urging other women who have been harassed to proclaim #MeToo on social media, tweeted in reply that victims are hurt by all forms of misconduct. All are evidence of misogyny.
Still, as the rush of stories about misbehaviour slows down — if it slows down — the point Damon raises will loom larger.
The New York Daily News groups many stories about misconduct allegations under the tag “Perv Nation.” The newspaper makes clear that not all allegations are the same, said Daily News executive Rebecca Baker, also president of the U.S. Society of Professional Journalists. But she added: “I don’t think the media can tell people what to think or stop people from conflating things.”
Society is in the midst of a debate over changing norms of behaviour that’s very intense and not very organized, said Nicholas Lemann, former dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. Distinctions can fall by the wayside with the temperature so high, he said. “It’s a good way for society to change its values,” Lemann said. “It’s a bad way to protect individual rights.”
In Smiley’s case, PBS agreed that his history of dating subordinates was the central issue in his firing. But a PBS statement also spoke mysteriously of “other conduct,” giving no other details in order to protect the privacy of people who complained about him.
An unwillingness, or inability, to specify behaviour that results in discipline can contribute to conflation. In firing reporter Ryan Lizza, the New Yorker magazine cited “improper sexual behaviour.” Lizza said his bosses mischaracterized “a respectful relationship with a woman I dated.” Her lawyer disputed this, saying the relationship wasn’t respectful, but wouldn’t say why.
A TV news producer recently dismissed because of his behaviour is concerned that he will be lumped in with bad-behaving media men such as Matt Lauer or Charlie Rose, and had his lawyer issue a statement saying his client was never “accused of any physical contact, language of a sexual nature or any sort of lewd conduct.”
But how he’s judged is ultimately out of his control, since neither employer nor employee will publicly say what the person actually did that cost him his job.
Early stories on misconduct cases — such as the New York Times and New Yorker on Weinstein — were meticulously reported and have proven airtight. The challenge for news organizations is maintaining that rigour with more women coming forward to tell their stories and the pressure for scoops ratchets up.
“If you don’t have one of these things really nailed down, it’s a very bad thing for you,” Lemann said. “Whoever gets one of these things wrong, it’s going to be very embarrassing.”