Times Colonist

Region transport authority push riles some mayors

- BILL CLEVERLEY bcleverley@timescolon­ist.com

In a move that is angering some local politician­s, Capital Regional District staff are recommendi­ng going to counter petition for approval to create a new $2-million regional transporta­tion authority.

Under a counter petition, an initiative is approved unless at least 10 per cent of electors sign a petition against it.

Langford Mayor Stew Young called the proposal an “underhande­d” attempt by the CRD to create what he sees as an unnecessar­y new service.

“I don’t need the CRD to tell me that we need to fix the road into town or figure out the E&N [rail corridor],” Young said, adding that his municipali­ty shouldn’t be forced to participat­e in a CRD service if it doesn’t want to.

“My taxpayers are fed up with the CRD costs. They’re fed up with new programs at the CRD and no acountabil­ity. Here’s another example of why the public is getting pissed off with the CRD.”

The proposed new service will only duplicate services already being provided by the province and municipali­ties, Young said, noting that Transporta­tion Minister Claire Trevena has already said the province will be looking at Island highways from a regional perspectiv­e.

“So this is just another waste of taxpayers’ money right now,” Young said.

View Royal Mayor David Screech, vice-chairman of the CRD board and a strong supporter of a transporta­tion service, said the new service would not require new money to be spent. Instead, it would be funded by reallocati­ng existing funds already budgeted for things like regional trails and planning.

Screech said the new transporta­tion service is needed “to send a clear signal to the province that we’re serious about transporta­tion issues and [to] give us a collective voice with which to sit down and have discussion­s with the province.”

But municipali­ties such as Langford and Colwood are concerned that their local transporta­tion issues might take a back seat to those of the core municipali­ties. The two municipali­ties, which are facing double-digit CRD property tax increases this year (largely to pay for the sewage-treatment megaprojec­t), also worry that a small initial budget will do nothing but grow.

“Do we need somebody to co-ordinate and look at transporta­tion in a holistic way? Absolutely,” said Colwood Mayor Carol Hamilton, who voiced concerns about increasing costs. “Is this the right place to land it? I’m not convinced.”

In order to create any new service, the CRD must gain approval through a referendum or an alternate approval process such as a counter petition, or by getting the approval of all municipal councils and conducting an alternate approval process in the elecotral areas. CRD staff said a counter petition would take between three and five months and would cost about $12,000, while a referendum would take four to six months and would likely cost more than $200,000.

Running a referendum in conjunctio­n with October local government elections is not likely to save much, staff said. The CRD cannot require municipali­ties to participat­e nor can it be assured that the same question would be asked throughout the region. Screech has no problem with a counter petition. “To me the answer is so glaringly obvious I just don’t see what a referendum would gain. I think it would pass overwhelmi­ngly,” Screech said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada