Bannon refuses to answer questions in Russia probe
Stance provokes congressional subpoena; ex-aide also subpoenaed to testify before federal grand jury
WASHINGTON — Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon on Tuesday refused to answer a broad array of queries from the House Intelligence Committee about his time working for U.S. President Donald Trump, provoking a subpoena from the panel’s Republican chairman.
The development brought to the forefront questions about White House efforts to control what the former adviser tells Congress about his time in Trump’s inner circle and whether Republicans on Capitol Hill would force the issue in light of the newly issued subpoena from the GOP-controlled panel.
The congressional subpoena came the same day the New York Times reported that Bannon — a former far-right media executive and recently scorned critic of the president — has been subpoenaed by special counsel Robert Mueller to testify before a federal grand jury.
With the issuance of Mueller’s subpoena, Bannon becomes the highestranking person who served in the Trump White House to be called before a grand jury as part of the special counsel’s investigation.
By itself, the move doesn’t confirm that Mueller is presenting evidence to support future criminal charges. But it does show that Mueller is still actively using a grand jury as he probes the actions of Trump, his family and his staff during the campaign, presidential transition and the early months of the administration.
Congressional officials declined to say whether Bannon disclosed Mueller’s subpoena during an all-day, closed-door interview with members of the House Intelligence Committee.
The members grilled Bannon as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian election inference. Lawmakers also wanted answers from him about Trump’s thinking when he fired FBI Director James Comey.
But Bannon refused to answer questions about that crucial period, prompting the committee’s chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes of California, to issue the subpoena, Nunes spokesman Jack Langer said.
Late Tuesday, Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the top Democrat on the committee, said Bannon’s refusal to answer those questions came at the instruction of the White House.
“This was effectively a gag order by the White House,” Schiff said shortly after Bannon’s interview concluded. Schiff said the committee plans to call Bannon back for a second interview.
At the White House, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said “no one” had encouraged Bannon not to be transparent during questioning, but there’s a “process of what that looks like.”
“As with all congressional inquiries touching upon the White House, Congress must consult with the White House prior to obtaining confidential material. This is part of a judicially recognized process that goes back decades,” Sanders said.
A White House official said Trump did not seek to formally exert executive privilege over Bannon — a move that would have barred him from answering certain questions. The official said the administration believes it doesn’t have to invoke the privilege to keep Bannon from answering questions about his time in the White House. The official spoke on condition of anonymity.
The House committee had planned to press Bannon on “executive actions” taken by Trump that have drawn interest from congressional investigators prying into ties between Trump’s campaign and Russian operatives.
Those key elements bear directly on the criminal investigation led by Mueller, who is investigating ties between the Trump campaign and Russia and whether the president obstructed justice by firing Comey or by taking other actions to thwart investigators.
The focus on Bannon follows his fall from power after being quoted in a book saying that he sees the president’s son and others as engaging in “treasonous” behaviour for taking a meeting with Russians during the 2016 campaign.
In Michael Wolff’s Fire and Fury, Bannon accuses Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort of betraying the U.S. by meeting Russian lawyers and lobbyists who they believed had “dirt” on Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton.