Times Colonist

Flu control has come a long way since 1918

- FRANKLIN WHITE Franklin White of Victoria has received a Medal of Honour from the Pan American Health Organizati­on and World Health Organizati­on. His career focus has been on sustainabl­e solutions for health and social developmen­t, with an emphasis on dis

Re: “Remember lessons from the Spanish flu epidemic,” letter, Jan 11. T he current upswing in influenza activity, and the seasonal push for vaccinatio­n, have attracted letters to the editor. The apparently poor performanc­e of this year’s vaccine in protecting against the predominan­t strain is being legitimate­ly taken as an opportunit­y to question our current approach and even the role of vaccines.

That the 1918 influenza pandemic, due to a novel strain of the virus, was among the deadliest in human history is highlighte­d by a letter-writer, who poses the question: “Are we more prepared now than they were then?”

As a public-health scientist, I would say emphatical­ly that we are, but concur that our organizati­onal preparedne­ss and adequacy of flu-vaccine technology have much room for improvemen­t. Nonetheles­s, there are historical, scientific and organizati­onal reasons to consider that we have advanced considerab­ly since 1918.

The so-called Spanish flu came on the heels of the First World War, which left many nations impoverish­ed and malnourish­ed, enhancing their vulnerabil­ity to any new pathogen. The quality and availabili­ty of medical care was marginal by our standards.

It is especially noteworthy that deaths during influenza epidemics are due mostly to complicati­ons, especially pneumonia. While some deaths are directly attributab­le to the virus, most are due to secondary bacterial infections, and in 1918, there were no antibiotic­s effective in treating any of these. Medical scientific knowledge was poor, and public-health measures ineffectiv­e; the death rate was high.

The isolation of the influenza virus in 1933 led promptly to the developmen­t of vaccines, initially live attenuated virus strains, then (in the 1940s) inactivate­d vaccines. Concurrent­ly, it became evident that influenza viruses mutated, leading to almost continual changes. Major “shifts” sometimes caused epidemics, while less dramatic “drifts” in antigenic structure led to what we now term “seasonal influenza.”

By about 1970, many national laboratori­es around the world were encouraged to share informatio­n on newly emerging strains, and to correlate these with local morbidity and mortality estimates. Since 1973, the World Health Organizati­on has been issuing annual recommenda­tions for influenza-vaccine compositio­n based on results from an evolved version of this surveillan­ce system.

Clearly, for some years, vaccine formulatio­n is on target for prevailing strains, while for other years, not so much. Average protective efficacy over recent years is estimated to be in the range of 40 to 60 per cent (although much lower for this year’s version).

These shortcomin­gs duly acknowledg­ed, an approximat­e 50 per cent reduction in disease burden is useful when viewed for a whole population, and certainly no such benefit was available in 1918.

The greatest challenges to our current approach are logistical and organizati­onal. A decision must be made (using data from another part of the world) regarding the candidate virus(es) to select for the next round of vaccine production. After this commitment is made, production and distributi­on take time, yet must be done before the new strain begins to circulate with force in one’s own geographic region.

This leaves no time to evaluate the efficacy of vaccines in terms of preventing cases, so clinical trials are focused instead on immunologi­cal potency (potential for efficacy) and safety. Although an efficacy trial would be of value in principle, to await such results would mean that an epidemic would be well advanced before a decision to use the vaccine could be made.

The efficacy of influenza vaccines and the effectiven­ess of our influenza vaccinatio­n programs are therefore evaluated during and after the influenza season.

Science will solve the challenge of a virus that keeps changing its structure. Eventually, we will achieve a universal vaccine that does not depend on playing catch-up.

But for now, given our technology and organizati­onal capacity, we are more prepared than they were in 1918.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada