Feds appeal B.C. court’s ruling on indefinite solitary confinement

VANCOUVER — The federal government is appealing a B.C. court decision that struck down Canada’s law on indefinite solitary confinement, arguing it needs clarity on the issue from the courts.

The ruling was handed down last month following a constitutional challenge by British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and the John Howard Society of Canada.

The association’s executive director, Josh Paterson, said the appeal is a surprise.

“We find it shocking that our federal government has chosen to appeal this decision when the government came into office on a promise to put an end to indefinite solitary confinement,” he said in a statement.

Justice Peter Leask of the B.C. Supreme Court said in his Jan. 17 decision that indefinite segregation undermines the safety and security of inmates, staff and the public.

The Crown argued the practice was reasonable and necessary, but the judge accepted the association’s position that solitary confinement is cruel, inhumane and can lead to severe psychological trauma.

The ruling was suspended for 12 months to give the federal government time to draft new legislation, which Leask said must include strict time limits on segregation.

Following the decision, Paterson said the civil liberties association wrote to the federal ministers of justice and public safety, seeking an end to further court action.

“Having won in court, we extended a hand to the government to work together to fix this problem to no avail,” he said. “Despite us reaching out, to date, the federal government has given us no response other than filing this appeal.”

After Leask’s judgment, Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said the government was reviewing it and was “committed to addressing the needs of the most vulnerable in the federal correctional system.”

On Monday, Goodale’s office said an appeal in the case is necessary as it examines the B.C. decision and a separate ruling from a court in Ontario.

The decision from Ontario Superior Court Justice Frank Marrocco released in December found administrative segregation longer than five days is unconstitutional, but the practice itself does not violate constitutional rights, even when applied to young inmates or the mentally ill.