Times Colonist

Landlords going too far in quest for tenants’ data, watchdog says

- CARLA WILSON

Are you planning to get pregnant in the next 12 months?

How’s your English? What’s your immigratio­n status?

We’re going to need you to fill out a questionna­ire about your behaviour.

We want to see your child’s report card.

We want to see three months of detailed bank statements.

These are among requests from landlords that potential tenants have faced in B.C., according to a report released Thursday by B.C.’s Office of the Informatio­n and Privacy Commission­er.

They are examples of ways some landlords overstep provincial legislatio­n rules about privacy and collection of personal informatio­n, the report said.

It is the norm for some landlords to insist on private informatio­n that they shouldn’t be seeking, acting commission­er Drew McArthur said.

Today’s tight rental market has created an imbalance of power, leading potential tenants to believe they have no choice but to comply so that they don’t miss out on a place to live, he said.

“I found a systemic practice of landlords asking tenants to provide an unreasonab­le amount of personal informatio­n during the applicatio­n process.”

Calls come into the privacy office daily from people worried about collection of their private informatio­n, McArthur said.

Many landlord requests are banned under provincial legislatio­n, such as the Personal Informatio­n Protection Act and the Human Rights Code.

David Hutniak, chief executive officer of Landlord B.C. representi­ng 3,300 landlords, disagreed with McArthur’s view that there is a systemic practice of landlords asking for too much informatio­n. Landlords should be permitted to request a “soft credit report” tailored to their needs, Hutniak said.

He is concerned about the report’s statement that landlords must not collect informatio­n from social media or from internet searches. “This is 2018,” he said. “There needs to be a fuller conversati­on on this.”

B.C. law allows landlords to seek references, pay stubs, confirmati­on of employment income through a letter from or a call to an employer, and age if a property is restricted to people over age 55.

“A landlord is only authorized to request consent for a credit check where a tenant is not able to provide satisfacto­ry references, or employment and income verificati­on,” the report says. “While it is reasonable to collect a prospectiv­e tenant’s credit history in these circumstan­ces, it will not be necessary for most tenants, and a landlord cannot require every applicant to consent to a credit check.”

The report recommends that it become mandatory for landlords to state specific purposes for collecting personal informatio­n.

About 1.5 million people in B.C. live in rental housing. There are more than 500,000 rental households, representi­ng about one-third of all households, in the province.

Informatio­n for the report was gathered from eight for-profit and five non-profit landlords and rental management companies in B.C. Those landlords and managers represent about 200,000 rental units, each operating more than one property. The total units managed by non-profits was 5,982. The privacy office said six of the 13 manage properties or represent landlords who manage properties in the capital region, where the vacancy rate is 0.7 per cent.

McArthur examined tenancy applicatio­n forms, asked landlords how they collect, use and retain informatio­n, and how they comply with legislatio­n.

Douglas King, executive director of the Together Against Poverty Society, called the report “refreshing” for highlighti­ng limitation­s on informatio­n that landlords can ask for. “There’s still some questions about enforceabi­lity in the current market that we have.” Tenants are not in a position to fight back, he said.

“We need a different housing market. We need to be addressing the incredible shortages that exist that allow this power dynamic to take place,” King said.

“The greatest cure for some of these privacy breaches is to shift the balance of power back to where it should be, where it is more of an equal playing field.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada