Times Colonist

Watchdogs call for more oversight over voters’ privacy

-

OTTAWA — Canada’s privacy watchdogs are collective­ly calling on all levels of government to force political parties to disclose any personal informatio­n they hold on voters and allow for independen­t oversight to ensure they are respecting the privacy of the electorate.

In a joint resolution published Monday, Canada’s informatio­n and privacy ombudsmen and commission­ers say recent events have revealed concerning practices deployed by political parties using digital tools to collect and use personal informatio­n — often without their knowledge or consent — to target individual­s for political gain.

These increasing­ly sophistica­ted big data practices raise new privacy and ethical concerns, the commission­ers say, underscori­ng the need for greater transparen­cy.

“Informatio­n about our political views is highly sensitive and it’s clearly unacceptab­le that federal and provincial political parties are not subject to privacy laws,” federal privacy commission­er Daniel Therrien said in an interview Monday.

In March, Therrien launched an investigat­ion into the alleged unauthoriz­ed use of some 87 million Facebook profiles globally — including those of more than 600,000 Canadians — by Cambridge Analytica, a firm accused of improperly helping to crunch data for Donald Trump’s U.S. presidenti­al campaign.

Therrien said his officials are still poring over data holdings from Facebook and Victoria-based AggregateI­Q, which has also been implicated in the Cambridge Analytica data breach. A team of investigat­ors visited the office of AggregateI­Q last week to gather informatio­n for the probe, Therrien said.

The companies have been co-operative with this investigat­ion, he said.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal shone a spotlight on how parties use personal data to target voters for political gain.

The federal Liberals have proposed changes to national election laws that would require parties to enact privacy policies.

Therrien said the legislativ­e proposals in the bill, known as C-76, add “nothing of substance” for privacy protection, noting the new law does not establish standards for how personal informatio­n is handled, nor does it allow for independen­t oversight.

“We have a federal election in a year’s time in Canada and political parties federally are not subject to privacy laws. I think Canadians should be concerned,” Therrien said.

British Columbia is the only jurisdicti­on in Canada that has brought political parties under privacy law. Voters in B.C. can also complain to an independen­t body about use of their private informatio­n by parties.

B.C. privacy commission­er Michael McEvoy said he believes the rest of the country would do well to adopt similar laws. And he’s not alone. A the House of Commons privacy committed recommende­d this year that privacy laws should be extended to cover political parties, and give greater investigat­ive and enforcemen­t powers to the federal privacy commission­er.

 ??  ?? Federal privacy commission­er Daniel Therrien: “It’s clearly unacceptab­le that federal and provincial political parties are not subject to privacy laws.”
Federal privacy commission­er Daniel Therrien: “It’s clearly unacceptab­le that federal and provincial political parties are not subject to privacy laws.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada