Times Colonist

A history of our free trade

- MONIQUE KEIRAN keiran_monique@rocketmail.com

After two years of trade uncertaint­y with the U.S., it seems even the recently arrived-at resolution is in doubt. With this month’s elections shifting the political-power landscape down south, the U.S.Canada-Mexico trade agreement might not be approved.

However you feel about the agreement, Canadians negotiated it. That freedom and responsibi­lity result from independen­ce hard-won by Canada 92 years ago.

On Nov. 18, 1926, at a conference attended by leaders from Britain and the seven self-governing British dominions, delegates adopted a report by former British prime minister Arthur Balfour that defined a new relationsh­ip between Britain and the dominions. That relationsh­ip was as “autonomous communitie­s within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinat­e one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs.”

Balfour’s report paved the way for constituti­onal independen­ce for Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, the Irish Free State, India and Newfoundla­nd. Five years later, the 1931 Statute of Westminste­r made that independen­ce law.

Acts of the British parliament would no longer extend to Canada without Canada’s specific request and consent. Britain could no longer unilateral­ly negotiate and sign treaties on Canada’s behalf. When Britain declared war, Canada wasn’t automatica­lly also at war.

Canada could engage in its own foreign relations.

We acted quickly. By 1927, our first embassy opened in Washington, D.C. Since then, we’ve dealt directly with our southern neighbours and others.

But the journey to 1926 included many lessons highlighti­ng how Canada needed to look after its own interests.

Boundary disputes, in particular, stoked motivation.

The 1846 Oregon Treaty between Britain and the U.S. predated Canada but caused headaches later for the young nation. The treaty establishe­d the border between British North America and the U.S. along the 49th parallel to the Strait of Georgia, then south between the mainland and the islands.

It was a compromise. British negotiator­s chose peace and good relations with the U.S. instead of a boundary that followed the Columbia River; the territorie­s that are now Washington state and parts of Oregon became American. The Americans wanted the boundary to follow today’s Alaskan border.

The redrawn map angered residents in Upper (now central) Canada. Wording about the boundary’s water route off the coast was also unclear. The treaty stated the marine boundary follows “the deepest channel” out to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The British claimed this meant Rosario Strait, to the east of the strategica­lly important San Juan Islands. The Americans claimed Haro Strait on the west side of those islands was the correct route.

It took a series of events triggered in 1859 by a wandering pig to resolve the San Juan Boundary Dispute.

In the Pig War, a pig owned by a British, Hudson’s Bay Company employee on San Juan Island wandered onto an American settler’s farm, where it dug up and dined on the farmer’s potatoes. The settler killed and ate the pig. The pig’s owner was angry.

Tensions rose. The U.S. army was called in. The British navy responded. A U.S. army captain promised to “make a Bunker Hill of it.” The Colony of British Columbia’s governor clamoured to send in the Royal Marines.

Washington and London were not amused. They sent in the brass to negotiate. In the end, the only casualty of the Pig War was the pig.

But it wasn’t until 13 years after pig became pork and five years after Canada became a nation that the boundary was settled. In 1872, an internatio­nal commission drew the boundary down Haro Strait.

Thirty years later, the Alaska boundary dispute was similarly resolved. In 1903, arbitratio­n of the line separating the Alaska panhandle and B.C. again favoured the U.S., blocking an all-Canadian route from the Yukon gold fields to the sea.

The repeated British concession­s infuriated Canadians and caused many to question the country’s position in the British Empire. As opportunit­y arose in following decades, Canada took steps to increase its independen­ce.

In 1911, Canada refused free trade with the U.S. In 1917, prime minister Robert Borden insisted that Canada would send more troops to fight in the First World War only if they remained within an intact Canadian Corps. Leveraging its war record, Canada became a founding member of the League of Nations. In 1922, we declined to automatica­lly provide military support to Britain in a dispute with Turkey.

Each event staked a bit more independen­ce. The culminatio­n was the Canadian Constituti­on Act, 1982.

Boundary issues remain and trade disputes still arise, but Canada now negotiates its own path.

 ??  ?? Mexican Economy Secretary Ildefonso Guajardo Villarrea, left, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland and U.S. trade representa­tive Robert Lighthizer at a NAFTA meeting in January.
Mexican Economy Secretary Ildefonso Guajardo Villarrea, left, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland and U.S. trade representa­tive Robert Lighthizer at a NAFTA meeting in January.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada