Times Colonist

California ponders home-building ban in fire-prone areas

- DON THOMPSON

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California’s increasing­ly deadly and destructiv­e wildfires have become so unpredicta­ble that government officials should consider banning home constructi­on in vulnerable areas, the state’s top firefighte­r says.

Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Director Ken Pimlott will leave his job Friday after 30 years with the agency.

In an interview with the Associated Press, he said government and citizens must act differentl­y to protect lives and property from fires that now routinely threaten large population­s.

That might mean rethinking subdivisio­ns in thickly forested mountainou­s areas or homes along Southern California canyons lined with tinder-dry chaparral. Los Angeles County supervisor­s on Tuesday were considerin­g whether to allow a 19,000-home developmen­t in fire-prone mountains amid heavy criticism of the location’s high fire danger.

California residents should also train themselves to respond more quickly to warnings and make preparatio­ns to shelter in place if they can’t outrun the flames, Pimlott said.

Communitie­s in fire zones need to harden key buildings with fireproof constructi­on similar to the way cities prepare for earthquake­s, hurricanes or tornadoes, and should prepare commercial or public buildings to withstand fires with the expectatio­n hundreds might shelter there as they did in makeshift fashion when flames last month largely destroyed the Sierra Nevada foothills city of Paradise in Northern California.

California already has the nation’s most robust building requiremen­t programs for new homes in fire-prone areas, but recent fire seasons underscore more is needed. Officials must consider prohibitin­g constructi­on in particular­ly vulnerable areas, said Pimlott, who has led the agency through the last eight years under Gov. Jerry Brown.

He said it’s uncertain if those decisions should be made by local land managers or at the state level as legislativ­e leaders have suggested. But Pimlott said “we owe it” to homeowners, firefighte­rs and communitie­s “so that they don’t have to keep going through what we’re going through.”

“We’ve got to continue to raise the bar on what we’re doing and local land-use planning decisions have to be part of that discussion,” he said.

California’s population has doubled since 1970 to nearly 40 million, pushing urban sprawl into mountain subdivisio­ns, areas home to fast-burning grasslands and along scenic canyons and ridgetops that are susceptibl­e to fires. After a crippling drought, the last two years have seen the worst fires in state history. November’s fire in Paradise was the deadliest U.S. wildfire in a century, killing at least 85 people and destroying nearly 14,000 homes.

Every year since at least 2013, firefighte­rs did not anticipate California’s wildfires could get worse, Pimlott said. But each year the fires have increased in intensity — driven by dry fuels, an estimated 129 million droughtand bark beetle-killed trees, and climate change.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada