Times Colonist

Green pact causes new chemical woes

- BOB WEBER

EDMONTON — A landmark environmen­tal agreement that helped to close the ozone hole in the 1990s has led to new chemical contaminan­ts forming in the atmosphere and accumulati­ng on land.

“The Montreal Protocol was probably one of the best regulation­s out there to involve all the countries at once,” said Heidi Pickard, one of nine researcher­s to publish the findings in a paper Thursday.

“But, of course, you have these unintended consequenc­es.”

The Montreal Protocol, which came into force in 1989, banned chlorofluo­rocarbons, or CFCs, that were used in refrigerat­ors, air conditione­rs and aerosol sprays. They were destroying the ozone layer, which helps to protect the planet from damaging ultraviole­t solar radiation. It has been signed by 197 parties and is considered the world’s most successful environmen­tal agreement.

But the chemicals used to replace the banned ones are breaking down in the atmosphere into new contaminan­ts known as short-chain fluorinate­d alkyl acids. They don’t seem to be as toxic as other long-lived contaminan­ts such as dioxins. They are, however, highly persistent, said co-author Amila De Silva of Environmen­t Canada. “They’re known as forever chemicals. They just don’t break down.”

Little is known about this family of chemicals, said Pickard, who now works at Harvard University. But at least one of them is known to be toxic to plants. Others harm freshwater insects, while others accumulate in plants, including food crops.

Although still measured in billionths of a gram per litre, their concentrat­ion in ice cores from two High Arctic locations has increased about sevenfold since 1990, said co-author Alison

Criscitiel­lo of the University of Alberta. “It’s significan­t,” she said. “The accumulati­on rate is fairly high.”

Concentrat­ions of one chemical known to be harmful are expected to increase as further substitute­s for the banned compounds are phased in.

Preliminar­y data suggests the concentrat­ion of these chemicals is higher in the south.

“When we measure rain and snow in populated urban areas, we’re finding quite a prevalence of these substances in much higher concentrat­ion,” De Silva said.

Finding these acids in two of Earth’s remotest places — the Devon Island ice cap and Mt. Oxford on Ellesmere Island — should be a warning, the scientists say. More needs to be known about them, and soon. “There is not toxicologi­cal informatio­n out there,” Pickard said.

No one knows, for instance, if they increase in concentrat­ions higher up the food chain.

“The lower end of the food web is probably the target for these substances — the invertebra­tes, the plankton, plants that take up water,” De Silva said.

Pickard said some scientists believe the chemicals can affect children’s immune systems at levels already exceeded in the ice cores. “There’s a lot of research that needs to be done,” Criscitiel­lo said. “It’s quite a large class of chemicals.”

The researcher­s hope their paper, in Geophysica­l Research Letters, will spark interest. If nothing else, they hope their findings highlight a need to cast a wide scientific net when environmen­tal regulation­s are drafted.

“When the Montreal Protocol came into effect, there wasn’t enough research available to understand [the consequenc­es],” De Silva said. “A more holistic approach to decision-making when it comes to environmen­tal impacts is necessary.”

 ??  ?? New contaminan­ts known as short-chain fluorinate­d alkyl acids have been detected in even the remotest areas of Nunavut.
New contaminan­ts known as short-chain fluorinate­d alkyl acids have been detected in even the remotest areas of Nunavut.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada