Toronto Star

GO Transit vows to improve after snow woes

Commuters fume over delays, website outage on Monday

- TRANSPORTA­TION REPORTER TESS KALINOWSKI

GO Transit is promising its customers a better commute Wednesday morning after a blizzard and a website failure created a perfect storm of anger for many commuters, who faced train delays, cancellati­ons and a fare hike on Monday.

The snowfall forecast by Environmen­t Canada for overnight Tuesday, into Wednesday, was expected to be heavier and stickier than the huge dump of drier precipitat­ion that fell within a relatively short period on Sunday and Monday.

The type of snow makes a big difference to train operations, said GO president Greg Percy on Tuesday.

Monday’s drier, fluffier flakes are “insidious” when it comes to infiltrati­ng the moving parts on track switches and train doors, he said. When snow and ice build up on the switches, the signals that tell train operators to move down the track don’t work.

GO brings in hot air blowers to keep its switches clear of ice and snow but “they’re not a panacea,” said Percy.

A failure at CP Rail’s Hamilton switch plant meant delays from the outset of Monday’s commute on the busy Lakeshore West line. Four trains that are stored in Hamilton overnight couldn’t move.

“Whenever you get trains backed up, they get out of their service window and that cascades into the other trains. You can handle that except at the convergenc­e point, which is Union Station,” he said.

On Monday, trains were lined up outside the station waiting for a turn at the platforms to unload passengers.

“That’s a real frustratin­g point, because people can see where they want to go and they can’t get there,” said Percy.

In an effort to reduce the risk of snow snarling switch movements for the evening rush, transit officials later cancelled nine trains and modified two express runs to make all stops.

Most train delays on Monday were in the 20- to 25-minute range, said Percy. But GO’s average 94-per-cent on-time performanc­e plunged to 50 per cent on Monday morning. Many GO bus runs that day were abbreviate­d or modified as road con- ditions made the schedules effectivel­y meaningles­s. On Tuesday, two switches on the Lakeshore West line actually broke and others froze, making for a second difficult day on the rails.

The operationa­l issues were compounded by the absence of service updates on GO’s website. The site’s failure “took us by big surprise,” said Percy, who admitted it was a shocking lapse caused by an overwhelme­d search function.

“Until we can build in the search demand capacity, we’ll keep doing a manual update, which is not something we can sustain in the long term but will probably get us by,” he said.

That interim solution means service updates will be entered manu- ally by staff in time for Wednesday’s commute, according to GO.

GO is also testing new doors less prone to failure.

“We’re prototypin­g a new technology, because there’s too many moving parts in this design,” said Percy. “We’re hoping to do a technology shift — assuming this prototype works.”

 ?? ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR ?? On Monday, the day most commuters faced a 5-per-cent average fare increase, only half of trains arrived on time in the morning, compared with the normal 94-per-cent average.
ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR On Monday, the day most commuters faced a 5-per-cent average fare increase, only half of trains arrived on time in the morning, compared with the normal 94-per-cent average.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada