Toronto Star

Croatia pits tourism against oil drilling

- DUSAN STOJANOVIC AND DARKO BANDIC THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

MEDULIN, CROATIA— Peter Fries has been coming to Croatia for years after falling in love with its pristine coastline, fresh seafood, mellow wine and friendly hosts.

With Croatia announcing it will allow oil drilling in the Adriatic Sea, the 60-year-old German businessma­n is having second thoughts about his loyalty to this Mediterran­ean tourist haven known for glorious sunsets over sparkling seas and white pebble beaches shadowed by thick pine forests. That picture-perfect image, he fears, could soon change with the constructi­on of giant offshore oil rigs on the horizon.

“This is a high-risk problem,” Fries said in a warm breeze that stirred the sea’s mirrored surface. “No one wants to swim or dive in a sea with pipelines, oil platforms and tankers.”

Despite surging opposition to pumping crude in the waters of one of Europe’s fastest-growing summer travel destinatio­ns, the Croatian government is determined to boost the state’s poor finances by offering several exploratio­n licenses to foreign energy companies.

The decision has deeply split the European Union’s newest member state of some 4.3 million, a country still scarred by the 1990s Balkans wars and where the untouched beauty of the Adriatic is a matter of national pride.

Opponents warn that besides damaging the spectacula­r scenery, offshore drilling represents a grave environmen­tal hazard, raising the risk of oil spills that could wreck tourism — the country’s main source of income. Supporters say pumping oil could bring billions of dollars to Croatia’s troubled economy, which has been in recession for years. They add that drilling could ultimately help Europe reduce its reliance on Russian energy imports.

“This is an existentia­l matter that will bring a better life to Croatian citizens,” Economy Minister Ivan Vrdoljak told The Associated Press.

The latest opinion polls indicate that 45 per cent of Croats are against Adriatic oil drilling, while 40 per cent are for it — with those in favour living mostly inland and far from the coast.

“The Adriatic is like a jewel that should not be touched,” said Ivo Lorencin, whose main income is renting rooms in a quiet bay in the northern Adriatic during the three-month summer peak season. “If the sea is destroyed, we all are destroyed.”

Croatia’s Adriatic tourism industry was already devastated once — during the war for independen­ce from former Yugoslavia.

The stunning medieval walled town of Dubrovnik was severely damaged by shelling, and broadcasts of warfare beamed around the world kept tourists away years after the conflict subsided.

Tourist numbers of about 11 million a year returned to pre-war levels in 2012, only after widespread rebuilding and a worldwide media campaign under the slogan: “The Mediterran­ean as it once was.”

The government believes that Croatia’s strategic position between Europe’s east and west could turn the country into a regional energy powerhouse, such as Norway in the North Sea.

“Croatia will then become an energy exporter which will bring security of supplies to the region,” Vrdoljak said. He said that environmen­tal risks would be minimal because the latest EU safety standards would be applied, and most of the new offshore platforms would not be visible from the main coast.

“All studies say that the (oil) production is a lesser environmen­tal risk than transporta­tion by tankers that we now use to import oil,” he said, adding that there was no need for a popular referendum demanded by the opposition, and hinted at by the country’s prime minister.

The initial exploratio­n, which will determine the quantities and profitabil­ity of oil production in the Adriatic, is set to start in June and last for five years before commercial pumping eventually begins.

There is little doubt that there are oil and gas reserves in the area. In neighbouri­ng Italy, dozens of offshore platforms currently operate, some siphoning crude. There are also 18 rigs on the Croatian side of the Adriatic that extract only gas, which is considered a much smaller environmen­tal risk than oil.

Croatia’s Greens are unimpresse­d by government’s safety pledges. They have started a petition campaign entitled “Say NO to oil in the Adriatic, say YES to sustainabl­e growth.”

“The risks are very high,” said Mirela Holy, the leader of ORaH, a small Green party that started the campaign.

“Alternativ­es are renewable energies, especially in the Adriatic, such as solar energy, windmills and small hydro power stations.”

Opponents also say Croatia’s tourist revenue of about 7.5 billion euros ($8.4 billion U.S.) a year far exceeds the potential financial benefits of oil exploratio­n, estimated by the government at euros 160 million ($180 million U.S.) a year in licenses given to oil companies.

 ?? DARKO BANDIC/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? An aerial photo of the Roman amphitheat­re in Pula, Croatia. Despite surging opposition to pumping oil from under the waters of the popular destinatio­n, Croatia is offering several exploratio­n licences to foreign energy companies.
DARKO BANDIC/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO An aerial photo of the Roman amphitheat­re in Pula, Croatia. Despite surging opposition to pumping oil from under the waters of the popular destinatio­n, Croatia is offering several exploratio­n licences to foreign energy companies.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada