Toronto Star

Would-be citizens thwarted by date change

New residency requiremen­ts kick in unexpected­ly early, creating additional hurdles

- NICHOLAS KEUNG IMMIGRATIO­N REPORTER

Antje Splettstoe­sser was counting down the days to June 6, when she would meet the residency requiremen­t to apply for Canadian citizenshi­p.

Anticipati­ng looming changes of the law by Ottawa, the German native had religiousl­y checked with the government call centre for the exact date when applicants would be required to be present in Canada for four years out of six — rather than three out of four — to qualify.

So eager was Splettstoe­sser, 35, to get her citizenshi­p that she would not even take a vacation, to ensure she accumulate­d enough days in Canada to beat the new residency requiremen­t.

“Every time I called, I was told the new law would take effect on June 19,” said Splettstoe­sser, a Toronto- based marketing and sales director of the German National Tourist Office, who first came to Canada on a work visa in 2009 and became a permanent resident three years ago.

“Then on June 5, Citizenshi­p and Immigratio­n Canada posted on its website that the new provision would be implemente­d on June 11.”

On June 6, she sent her applicatio­n package to the immigratio­n department’s processing centre in Sydney, N.S., via Canada Post priority service.

On June 25, Splettstoe­sser opened her mailbox and saw her returned citizenshi­p applicatio­n with the note: “You have submitted an outdated version of the citizenshi­p applicatio­n. Please resend your applicatio­n using the current version of the applicatio­n form.”

Splettstoe­sser will now be assessed under the higher residency threshold and must wait for at least another year to be eligible — and that means she won’t be able to spend a single day outside of Canada.

“I cannot tell you how frustratin­g this experience is to someone who really wants — officially and by law — to finally be a part of this society. I travel a lot for work and who knows when they are going to change the law again? It’s an issue of security for immigrants,” said Splettstoe­sser, who will be refunded the $630 applicatio­n fee.

“The lack of transparen­cy in this process is truly a shame. Even if you call the call centre, they can confirm that they were not aware of the June 11 date either and that it was a lastminute decision. It is one thing to change a law and another to properly put it in place.”

Immigratio­n officials could not provide the number of citizenshi­p applicatio­ns returned to date.

But they maintain the reforms help deter those who would become citizens only for the sake of having a Canadian passport to access taxpayer-funded benefits.

“Our reforms ensure new citizens are better prepared for full participat­ion in Canada’s economy and Canadian society. This is a win for newcomers and a win for Canada,” Immigratio­n Minister Chris Alexander said in a news release.

Among other citizenshi­p changes that came into force this month are: mandatory language requiremen­ts for applicants between 14 and 64 years old (changed from the previous 18 to 54 range); applicants’ declaratio­n to reside in Canada; and a maximum $100,000 fine and five-year jail term for those convicted of fraud and misreprese­ntation in their applicatio­ns.

Frances Rutherford said her husband, Felix Carpio, who immigrated here from Dominican Republic more than 30 years ago, turned 55 on May 28 and could have been exempt from the new language proficienc­y requiremen­t if they had known the changes were to come into effect June 11.

Rutherford said Ottawa made the announceme­nt on a Friday afternoon and allowed applicants just three office days to apply.

A friend of the couple who is a lawyer helped Carpio compile his applicatio­n and mail it June 8, but immigratio­n officials said it arrived June 11 and sent it back to them.

“We were so looking forward to this big event for him,” said Rutherford, who was born in Scotland and came here with her family when she was 2. “We are just angry and disappoint­ed.”

“Wouldn’t it be fair and appropriat­e to give people perhaps a threemonth warning of the change? This just feels so underhande­d. This can’t be Canada.”

Carpio, a house painter, can enrol in an English course and pay $300 to write and pass a standard test, or wait 10 years until he turns 65 and is exempt from the language proficienc­y requiremen­t — assuming the law hasn’t changed again.

 ??  ?? Antje Splettstoe­sser was caught off guard by early implementa­tion of new residency requiremen­ts.
Antje Splettstoe­sser was caught off guard by early implementa­tion of new residency requiremen­ts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada