Toronto Star

Doctors’ legal defence fund comes under fire

‘Things have to change,’ critics say of organizati­on that defends physicians’ mistakes on taxpayers’ dime

- THERESA BOYLE AND ROBERT CRIBB STAFF REPORTERS

Ontario’s two opposition parties are demanding more transparen­cy and accountabi­lity from the organizati­on that acts like a legal insurer to doctors.

“This all looks very bad from beginning to end. Things have to change,” NDP health critic France Gélinas said Tuesday, commenting on a Star investigat­ion into the Canadian Medical Protective Associatio­n.

The Star revealed that suing a doctor for medical malpractic­e can be a long, expensive, uphill battle and that many injured patients don’t even bother.

Doctors who are accused of medical negligence, criminal offences or regulatory transgress­ions get assistance from the deep-pocketed CMPA, a self-described “mutual protection” associatio­n. It gets most of its funding from taxpayers, via doctors, and has a reputation for aggressive­ly defending its clients.

Gélinas said she doesn’t agree with the CMPA’s view that it is not publicly funded since its revenue does not come directly from taxpayers. The money comes from physicians who are then reimbursed by the province, she noted.

“I don’t care that the money funnels through doctors. At the end of the day, it’s taxpayers’ money and the CMPA must be publicly accountabl­e for how it uses it,” she charged.

Taxpayers last year forked out almost $200 million to subsidize physicians’ annual CMPA fees, an amount that has grown by 3,200 per cent in 28 years. Ontarians now pay 81per cent of physician fees and doctors pay the rest.

“There is no way hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money should be going to an agency for which we have no accountabi­lity and no transparen­cy. This is unacceptab­le,” Gélinas argued.

She wants the CMPA to be included under a private member’s bill she introduced earlier this year that would expand government oversight of the health sector. If passed, the bill would allow the provincial auditor and ombudsman to investigat­e the CMPA and make it subject to freedom-of-informatio­n legislatio­n, as far as its dealings with Ontario doctors go.

Conservati­ve associate health critic Bill Walker also wants more accountabi­lity from the CMPA. He takes issue with taxpayer dollars being used to defend doctors in criminal cases.

“We want transparen­cy so taxpayers know where their money is going. How many cases are being funded, and how many dollars are being spent on each doctor?” Walker asked.

The public is entitled to know if a small group of doctors continuous­ly runs into trouble and racks up big bills, he said, hastily adding that it’s also important to protect doctors from frivolous lawsuits.

“If the doctor is a sexual predator, I don’t think taxpayers’ money should be spent here,” he said.

Even the government has big problems with the CMPA, said a source close to government. The issue of steeply rising CMPA subsidies was a sore point for government during last year’s contract talks with the Ontario Medical Associatio­n, which represents Ontario 28,000 doctors.

The CMPA subsidies became part of the negotiatio­ns in 1987, when the government agreed to pay a portion of physician fees in lieu of increasing their compensati­on.

The source said the government is looking at alternativ­e ways of funding doctors’ legal liability protection because it can’t keep up with the CMPA fee increases.

“I don’t care that the money funnels through doctors. At the end of the day, it’s taxpayers’ money.” FRANCE GÉLINAS NDP HEALTH CRITIC

Dr. Douglas Bell, the CMPA’s associate executive director, said the organizati­on is publicly accountabl­e to the extent that it makes financial statements available on its website.

He said that if the government wanted to change what kind of CMPA protection it provides reimbursem­ent for, for example legal assistance for criminal charges, that could be discussed during OMA talks.

Bell took issue, however, with an assertion made in the Star investigat­ion by Halifax lawyer John McKiggan, who said patients often don’t pursue malpractic­e lawsuits because they are unaware they are victims of medical errors. Bell said doctors are obliged to tell patients if mistakes were made. Theresa Boyle can be reached at tboyle@thestar.ca and 416-869-4915. Robert Cribb can be reached at rcribb@thestar.ca and 416-869-4411.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada