Toronto Star

Doig did not paint disputed work, judge rules

Evidence shows famous artist was at Toronto school in 1976 not in a Thunder Bay jail

- COLIN PERKEL

CHICAGO— A painting at the centre of a strange multimilli­on-dollar civil lawsuit filed by a former Canadian correction­al officer who owns the canvas was definitely not the work of famed artist Peter Doig, a Chicago judge ruled Tuesday.

In his decision, U.S. District Judge Gary Feinerman said the evidence showed that Doig, whose paintings have sold for more than $20 million, was not in a prison in Thunder Bay, in 1976 when the desert landscape was painted and sold to the guard.

The unpreceden­ted battle, closely watched by the art world, involved a claim by Robert (Bob) Fletcher, of Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., who argued that Doig painted the canvas, once valued at more than $10 million.

Doig disavowed the work, arguing the acrylic landscape was by Peter Doige, a man who once spent time locked up in Thunder Bay for a drug offence. Doig claimed he had never been in the northern Ontario city and only began painting on canvas in 1979. Among other things, Feinerman noted photos from a yearbook proved Doig, now 57, was at a Toronto high school and not in the prison in Thunder Bay where Fletcher worked.

Doig “absolutely did not paint” the impugned work, which was in fact by Doige, Feinerman found.

The suit had alleged Doig’s disavowal of the canvas — ostensibly to hide his criminal past — had potentiall­y cost Fletcher millions, because auctioneer­s refused to put the painting up for sale.

In a recent interview, Fletcher, 62, told The Canadian Press he was pursuing the claim despite the risk of having to pay hefty court costs to find out if the artwork was Doig’s so he could sell it.

The origins of the dispute date back 40 years, when Fletcher worked at the Thunder Bay Correction­al Centre and also attended classes at Lakehead University. At the school, he met a teenager named Peter Doige, who ended up in jail for possession of LSD and, during art classes at the institutio­n, painted the disputed work.

The 86-by-105-centimetre canvas depicts a desert scene with a pond. It is signed “Pete Doige 76.”

As a parole officer, Fletcher bought the painting for $100 as a way of helping Doige. Five years ago, Fletcher’s friend noticed the canvas and said it was done by Doig. That spurred Fletcher to do some digging, which, according to his claim, turned up “uncanny convergenc­es” between Doig and Doige: Both were born in the 1950s in Scotland; Doig’s family immigrated to Canada when he was a child; and Doig has admitted to having dabbled in LSD as a teen.

Marilyn Bovard, of Hinton, Alta., said in court filings that she believed her brother, who died in Edmonton in February 2012, was the painter and the scene appeared to be from around an area in Arizona where their mother lived. With files from The Associated Press

 ?? WHITTEN SABBATINI/THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
WHITTEN SABBATINI/THE NEW YORK TIMES
 ??  ?? Peter Doig argued the acrylic work was by a Peter Doige, a man who once spent time locked up in Thunder Bay.
Peter Doig argued the acrylic work was by a Peter Doige, a man who once spent time locked up in Thunder Bay.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada