Toronto Star

Why the Italy quake was so severe

- DAN BILEFSKY AND HENRY FOUNTAIN

The combinatio­n of a shallow fault and old, unreinforc­ed masonry buildings led to widespread devastatio­n in the earthquake that struck central Italy early Wednesday.

The magnitude-6.2 quake killed more than 100 people and trapped many more in the rubble of collapsed buildings.

Like other villages and towns in the mountainou­s area, Amatrice, where the mayor lamented that “half the town no longer exists,” has stone churches and other buildings that were constructe­d centuries ago, when little if anything was known about earthquake­s. Unless they have been reinforced in recent years, such structures are easily damaged or destroyed by shaking.

“Even 100 years ago, they didn’t know how to build structures to withstand earthquake­s,” said David A. Rothery, professor of planetary geoscience­s at the Open University in Milton Keynes, England.

The earthquake was less powerful than many recent deadly quakes. The magnitude-7.8 earthquake that struck Nepal in April 2015, for instance, killing 8,000 people, released roughly 250 times more energy.

But the Italian quake was very shallow: According to the U.S. Geological Survey, it occurred about 6 miles below the surface.

“Shallow earthquake­s cause more destructio­n than deep earthquake­s because the shallownes­s of the source makes the groundshak­ing at the surface worse,” Rothery said.

Earthquake­s are set off by the movement of the Earth’s crust, which is divided into large sections called tectonic plates. The Apennine Mountains, where the quake occurred Wednesday, are in an area where one plate, the African, is moving under another, the Eurasian.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada