Obama hits the trail for her new bestie
Women assure supporters of unity, shared goal despite different paths in public life
WASHINGTON— As first ladies they could hardly have been more different. But as Democrats looking to fire up female voters, Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton were firmly bonded on Thursday.
In their first joint appearance on the campaign trail, Mrs. Obama and Clinton talked up their shared respect, common values and singular goal: Defeating Republican Donald Trump. They papered over a somewhat rocky history and their vastly different paths through public life.
With Mrs. Obama aiming to secure her husband’s legacy and Clinton needing to propel women to the polls, the two women sought to celebrate their political marriage of mutual interest, and reassure voters it’s real.
“Seriously, is there anyone more inspiring than Michelle Obama?” Clinton asked, as a crowd in WinstonSalem, N.C., answered with cheers. Mrs. Obama declared the feeling mutual. She referred to Clinton as “my girl” and offered reassurance that her testimony for Clinton is both personal and political. Since she’s emerged as Clinton’s headline-grabbing surrogate, people have been wondering about one thing.
“Yes, Hillary Clinton is my friend,” she answered. It’s a reasonable question. In the East Wing, Clinton dived into policy, undertook a massive project and failed under a harsh spotlight. Mrs. Obama largely steered clear and enjoyed quieter, modest success. Both Ivy League-trained lawyers with their own careers, Clinton bridled under the stereotypes associated with the office, while Mrs. Obama declared herself “mom-inchief.” While Clinton held onto her maiden name, her Democratic successor let it be known she preferred the “Mrs.” title.
And when her time in the White House was ending, Clinton began plotting her return to Washington. Mrs. Obama hasn’t hidden her readiness to leave. The White House has quickly and repeatedly shot down any talk of the first lady continuing in politics.
Acknowledging her reluctance in the political spotlight, she said, “I would not be here” if she didn’t believe so strongly Clinton would be a president she would trust.
“I believe with all of my heart that Hillary Clinton will be that president,” she said.
Democrats have relished Mrs. Oba- ma’s speeches as high points of the campaign cycle. Her passionate response to Trump’s vulgar comments about women brought an emotional resonance that Clinton, who rarely gets personal on the stump, doesn’t often deliver.
Mrs. Obama’s appearances have be- come a key part of Clinton’s effort to fire up women — particularly black women, for whom she’s a model and a source of pride. Both Clinton and Mrs. Obama on Thursday revived a line from her DNC speech — “When they go low, we go high” — turning it into a call and response.
The North Carolina event drew some 11,000 people, according to the fire marshal, one of largest crowds of Clinton’s campaign.
The audience roared as the two women walked onstage, turned to each other and embraced, the first lady towering over the shorter candidate.
The Clintons and Obamas themselves have a fraught history, one that includes both spouses. While Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton battled in 2008, Michelle Obama raised questions about her husband’s opponent, framing the choice between the two as “about character.”
Since then the women have publicly buried the hatchet. They heap praise on each other’s work, although there’s little sign they’ve spent time one-on-one.
Comparing how first ladies use the office is especially tricky, historians note. Because the office comes with no set of constitutional duties, it is also a reflection of an individual’s style, personality, politics and times.
“Beneath the surface they both brought a sense of rigour and structure and focus,” he said. “They were very objective-oriented.”
Those objectives were clearly different, he said.
“I think Michelle Obama may end up being perhaps one of the most influential first ladies when it comes to influence on the American public, whereas Hillary has been one of the most important in terms of achievement in terms of policy.”