Toronto Star

Bill grants parental leave for councillor­s

Lack of extended time off for city officials was ‘especially onerous for women’

- KRISTIN RUSHOWY QUEEN’S PARK BUREAU

Local politician­s who have or adopt a baby during their term must seek their council’s approval to take parental leave — an oversight in the Municipal Act that a Liberal MPP considers “antiquated” and “demeaning” and says must be fixed.

“I think that people are stunned this even exists,” said Daiene Vernile of the lack of provision in the act for new parents. Currently, if councillor­s miss meetings three months in a row, they can lose their seat — unless they go before their colleagues to ask for permission to take more time off.

“I think that it just is a very small, forgotten part of the Municipal Act that has not come up that often,” added the Kitchener Centre MPP.

Vernile’s private member’s bill — which unanimousl­y passed second reading Thursday — to amend the Municipal Act and the City of Toronto Act, to guarantee up to 20 weeks off “if the absence is a result of the member’s pregnancy, the birth of the member’s child or the adoption of a child by the member.”

Quebec is considerin­g a similar bill, providing up to 18 weeks off.

The issue came to the forefront in Vernile’s backyard, with Kitchener councillor Kelly Galloway-Sealock giving birth to three children — the most recent was just over a week ago — while in office. She took very little time off work — keeping in touch with staff and constituen­ts by phone and email — missing just one council meeting each time. But she has been advocating for some recognitio­n of parental leave than two years.

“The Municipal Act is currently archaic . . . especially because you are seeing the demographi­c change around municipal councils and government in general. I think it’s time to have an update.”

Her pregnancie­s were not complicate­d, but she wonders what happens to women who may need more time off to recover from a caesarean birth, or if fellow councillor­s aren’t as supportive as hers are in Kitchener.

“I don’t think having a child should be the reason why you might lose your seat,” she said.

The Associatio­n of Municipali­ties of Ontario has also been seeking changes so that parental leave isn’t considered an absence from council. New Democrat MPP Catherine Fife wrote to Minister of Municipal Affairs Bill Mauro about the issue, and wonders why it has been left to a Liberal MPP to raise the issue in a private member’s bill with her own majority government.

“It’s unbelievab­le, and very disappoint­ing, that in 2016 we still have to ask our fellow councillor­s to take the parental leave without penalty,” said Fife (Kitchener—Waterloo).

She is also hoping the changes will be extended to school board trustees.

Municipal Affairs Minister Bill Mauro said councils can create their own local policies on leaves and that he supports “considerat­ion (of the bill) as it moves through the legislativ­e process.”

Oshawa Councillor Amy McQuaidEng­land, who found herself the subject of a complaint to children’s aid after she breastfed her baby at council, feels it is important that politician­s be available to their constituen­ts, and thinks some flexibilit­y — such as on-site child care, attending meetings and voting by phone, or being able to vote from another room while breastfeed­ing baby — would help.

Vernile said provincial­ly and federally, politician­s can take time off, and called the lack of extended leave to locally elected officials a barrier that’s “especially onerous for women.”

She noted women comprise just 26 per cent of councillor­s across Canada, and 16 per cent of all mayors.

Typically, across Canada, parental leave is one year.

 ??  ?? Tyson and Kitchener councillor Kelly Galloway-Sealock at Kitchener city council Monday night.
Tyson and Kitchener councillor Kelly Galloway-Sealock at Kitchener city council Monday night.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada