Toronto Star

Real estate agents flout laws by entertaini­ng bully bids in secret

Action particular­ly benefits those who represent both the seller and the buyer

- TESS KALINOWSKI

It’s not enough that Toronto-area homebuyers are facing competitio­n so fierce that list prices have become virtually meaningles­s and bully or pre-emptive offers are increasing­ly the norm. Now there’s an added twist. Some sellers’ agents say they will no longer notify other interested consumers when their client decides to entertain a pre-emptive bid, and not wait for the date they set to consider all offers.

Ontario’s real estate rules require the property seller’s brokerage to notify all other interested buyers that a “bully” offer, usually well over the asking price for the property, is being considered.

That notice allows other consumers to compete for the same property if they want to.

But, in the super-heated Toronto-area market, some brokers are including a line in their listings saying they reserve the right to accept pre-emptive offers without notice.

It is particular­ly advantageo­us to agents who are representi­ng both the seller and the buyer. This is because they don’t have to split their commission. Agents “double-ending” a sale need written permission from both the seller and buyer to do so.

“But that doesn’t account for people who are bidding on the house who end up losing on it because their agent isn’t the one who’s double-ending the deal,” said Kelvin Kucey, deputy registrar, regulatory compliance of the Real Estate Council of Ontario (RECO).

Rules around notifying consumers about bully offers form one of the areas covered in a RECO bulletin this week which reminds agents of their obligation­s around competitiv­e bids.

The bulletin puts agents on notice that they “have really got to level the playing field for consumers because this market is showing no signs of slowing down,” Kucey said.

“Offer handling,” a broad category that covers bully offers, competing bids, commission­s and whether realtors are properly disclosing their own interests, comprises the biggest category — 15 per cent to 20 per cent — of about 2,700 complaints the regulatory agency expects this year.

“It makes sense in a hot market that people, who are unfortunat­ely on the outside of a trade that they really wanted to be part of, are going to be concerned about how they ended up on the outside,” Kucey said.

It’s only fair, he said, that when a seller decides to consider a bully offer, other interested consumers understand that the bid date previously set no longer holds.

“If the rules of the game have changed, everybody’s entitled to know.

“You can’t change the rules halfway through the game,” he said.

“That’s what we’re taking umbrage with is this attempt by certain brokerages to say, ‘If we get a pre-emptive offer, we’re not going to let you know.’

“Well, no, you’re not going to do that because you are expressly required to advise people what’s going on.

“You can’t just play games like that,” Kucey said.

Agents know the rules and know that this kind of “terrible” practice isn’t allowed, said David Fleming of Bosley Real Estate, who believes RECO should come down harder on realtors who repeatedly violate the rules.

He’s among those who say that preemptive bids can limit the amount a seller gets for their property.

“I haven’t worked with a bully (bid) and we’ve done very well on offer night,” he said.

But, he added, “there are (agents) who are just out there thinking about the next deal and they’re not thinking about their long-term career. There’s zero benefit for the seller. Those agents are either giving that client bad advice or they’re working on their end game.”

Of agents who don’t want to notify other potential purchasers, Fleming asked:

“Are they lazy? Do they not want to make 20 phone calls or send 20 emails?

“If I was to work with a bully offer, I would call every single agent and then I would page them. Then I would email them. I know the rules and I need to be sure they’re followed.”

“There are (agents) who are just out there thinking about the next deal and they’re not thinking about their long-term career.” DAVID FLEMING BOSLEY REAL ESTATE

While there is a complaint process, it’s of little use to consumers in a fast-paced market where homes can sell in hours. It takes about six months on average for RECO to investigat­e a complaint, Kucey said.

A first offence for a violation, such as failing to notify buyers of a preemptive bid, would probably only result in a $5,000- to $10,000-fine.

The maximum is $25,000, even for a first offence, if the matter is sufficient­ly egregious.

“If (agents) are flouting these requiremen­ts, they’re going to be prosecuted,” Kucey said.

“It’s not going to be a warning or caution. There are going to be prosecutio­ns and it’s just a matter of time till we get to the maximums.”

Typically, RECO revokes 15 to 20 registrati­ons a year, usually for criminal or serious civil reasons.

 ?? GRAEME ROY/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? First offences for violations range between $5,000 and $10,000. The maximum fine for not notifying buyers of a pre-emptive bid is $25,000.
GRAEME ROY/THE CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO First offences for violations range between $5,000 and $10,000. The maximum fine for not notifying buyers of a pre-emptive bid is $25,000.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada