Toronto Star

Conversati­ons with ambassador an apparent conflict of interest

-

Sessions brushed aside top Democrats’ Thursday calls for his own resignatio­n, and Trump said he thought Sessions had “probably” been truthful in his testimony. Sessions said he was recusing himself only because he had been involved in Trump’s campaign, implying his January remarks were not a factor.

Regardless, the revelation that he deceived Congress adds more fuel to unproven suspicions that Trump is attempting to conceal something about his relationsh­ip with Russia and President Vladimir Putin. And the withdrawal of the nation’s top law enforcemen­t official from a major investigat­ion deepens the appearance of disarray from an administra­tion that was briefly buoyed by Trump’s well-received speech to Congress on Tuesday.

Why is Sessions controvers­y a big deal? The attorney general is the country’s chief legal official, and he may have lied to Congress under oath. Before the recusal, the conversati­ons with Kislyak put him in an apparent conflict of interest: the director of the FBI reports to him.

And whether it was a lie, an evasion or an unintentio­nal memory lapse, his decision not to tell Congress he had spoken to the ambassador added concerns that something improper transpired.

What are the key questions about Trump and Russia? Did Trump have anything to do with, or know about, Russia’s alleged interventi­on in the election to help him?

Did Trump direct his associates to communicat­e with Russian officials during the campaign, or know those communicat­ions were happening?

What exactly did Trump associates say to Russian officials?

Does Russia have any informatio­n that could blackmail or otherwise weaken Trump?

So who is investigat­ing what? Multiple U.S. intelligen­ce agencies are conducting a joint probe into the alleged Russian interferen­ce in the election, which they believe involved the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

One of the things they are studying, according to the New York Times, is communicat­ion between Trump associates and the Russian government.

The Senate and House intelligen­ce committees are conducting their own separate probes into the alleged Russian meddling.

Some Democrats have advocated an investigat­ion by an independen­t commission. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called Thursday for a special prosecutor from outside the Department of Justice.

Is there proof that Trump did anything wrong? None that we know of.

So why is there so much talk about all this? There is no public smoking gun. There is, however, a collection of facts that has prompted suspicion among Democrats and others.

Trump has effusively praised and aggressive­ly defended Putin.

His campaign team, largely handsoff when it came to the Republican policy platform, intervened to soften the platform’s support of Ukraine.

During the campaign, Trump publicly urged Russian hackers to obtain Clinton’s emails. After U.S. intelligen­ce and independen­t experts later concluded that Russia had indeed hacked the Democrats, Trump dismissed and disparaged them.

Flynn discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with Kislyak, told Vice-President Mike Pence he had not done so, then resigned after the Washington Post revealed the truth.

Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, has long-standing ties to Russia, and he resigned from the campaign after allegation­s that he had received millions in cash from Ukraine’s former pro-Russia president.

Was it wrong for Sessions to meet the Russian ambassador? Not necessaril­y.

He was a U.S. senator, and he met many ambassador­s. But the context raises questions about what went on.

One of the meetings was held in September 2016, the month before U.S. intelligen­ce officially accused Russia of doing the hacking.

While Sessions said the meeting was not about the campaign, all 25 other members of the Armed Services Committee told the Post they did not meet with Kislyak in 2016. On Thursday, Sessions said Ukraine “somehow” came up in the conversati­on; he did not elaborate.

Multiple U.S. intelligen­ce agencies are conducting a joint probe into the alleged Russian interferen­ce

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada