Toronto Star

For Lamborghin­i, the S should stand for stunning

- Jim Kenzie

LIVIGNO, ITALY— You’d think that with your flagship car being only six years old, still with stunning styling and loads of performanc­e from a 700 horsepower V12 engine, you could afford to rest on your laurels a little.

Not if you want to succeed at the very sharpest end of the supercar field.

And not if your brand name is Lamborghin­i.

Because Ferrari doesn’t hang around, and since the Aventador was introduced, McLaren has become a major player in this game.

The Aventador was really about two things — stunning looks, stunning engine.

The new S model tweaks the former with wider grille openings, added vents to move all that air around and a deployable rear wing to tailor downforce, as needed.

You’d think increasing horsepower by 40 to 740 (on the European scale; for us, we’d probably now say 730) would be the big mechanical story.

Nope. While various engine mods have been applied, peak torque is only up by a single pound-foot; most of the added power comes from a higher rev limit.

Higher revs? Can that make this engine sound even better than it already does? Oh, yes.

Lamborghin­i claims the same 0-100 km/h number as before — 2.9 seconds.

Hardly shabby, but you’d think 40 more cavallini would yield a bigger increase than that.

No, the big news is Lamborghin­i’s first applicatio­n of rear-wheel steering.

Electromec­hanical actuators can steer the rear wheels up to 1.5 degrees in phase with the fronts for more stable high-speed manoeuvres, or up to three degrees counterpha­se for more agility at lower speeds.

Lorenzo Rinaldi, head of vehicle dynamics R& D for Lamborghin­i, says the former is equivalent to increasing the wheelbase by 700 millimetre­s, the latter to shortening it by 500 mm.

Now, four-wheel steering is hardly new. Mazda and Honda messed with it — geez, 30 years ago. At that time, it was the answer to the question nobody asked. Today, several very high-powered cars offer it because it may be the only way to drive both power and agility forward simultaneo­usly.

I didn’t have the advantage of being able to drive an S and a “non-S” back-to-back. But some of the instructor­s at the Lamborghin­i Winter Driving program I was attending had done just that and said the difference was night and day.

It wasn’t just how much more agile and stable the car felt. Lap times were considerab­ly better, too. It felt better, it WAS better.

Now, part of that might be attributab­le to massive new tires developed specifical­ly by Pirelli for this car.

The magnetorhe­ological dampers (Magnaride to GM cognoscent­i) have also been reworked to provide both better control and better ride.

The front-to-rear torque split of the four-wheel drive system depends on the mode setting you choose. “Strada” (street) gives you 40/60. “Sport” (well, sport) gives you 10/90. “Corsa” (race) backs that off to 20/80.

If that latter data point sounds surprising, the point is that for ultimate lap times, a higher percentage of front-wheel pull is the answer. By sport, they seem to be saying “you’re just messing around” and the 10/90 ratio allows you to get into lurid drifts more easily. Not the fast way, just the most spectacula­r.

The control for these modes also affects throttle response, shift quality and speed, and damper settings. Many drivers actually prefer Sport on a race track because Corsa makes the throttle almost too jumpy, too hard to modulate when trying to balance the car in a high-speed corner.

For the first time, there is also an “EGO” setting, which allows the driver to independen­tly select settings for each of the attributes rather than getting them all set to preestabli­shed levels.

So, you might choose Strada for dampers for smooth ride, Corsa for steering and Sport for throttle and transmissi­on.

And EGO doesn’t seem to carry quite the same connotatio­n in Italian as it does in English.

It just suggests “self” and applies to the settings you as an individual choose.

The main drawback to the Aventador has always been the singleclut­ch manumatic transmissi­on, when virtually everybody else has gone to a dual-clutch setup. Especially in Corsa mode, up- or downshifts feel like you’ve been kicked in the butt by a mule.

You can mitigate this to a degree by easing off/blipping the throttle during the up- and downshift process, but you’ll always know it’s shifting.

Lamborghin­i says with the huge engine effectivel­y pointing backwards, the transmissi­on must sit between the seats and a bulkier dual-clutch unit simply wouldn’t fit.

If you want the rest of the joys of driving an Aventador (or Aventador S), you’ll just have to learn to live with this.

Until today, I don’t think I have ever conducted a preview test exclusivel­y on snow and ice. But, both Kia Stinger and Lamborghin­i Aventador S have broken that streak.

Especially with a car as powerful as the Aventador S, this actually provided an opportunit­y I might never have had otherwise, a chance to put the car into a series of slides and spins that, if attempted on dry pavement, would surely have ended in tears, not to mention shredded carbon fibre.

The Aventador S is also an obvious example of “if you have to ask its price, you can’t afford it.” But it’s $463,775, excluding taxes.

There probably are some who own both, but there seem to be Ferrari people and Lamborghin­i people, with McLaren people now coming on strong, too.

The Aventador used to be all about the sense of occasion and the straight-line speed.

Those are still there in the S version, but now you have some deftness when the road starts to bend.

And that’s a very good thing, indeed.

 ?? JIM KENZIE FOR THE TORONTO STAR ?? Lamborghin­i’s Aventador S is an obvious example of “if you have to ask its price, you can’t afford it,” at $463,775.
JIM KENZIE FOR THE TORONTO STAR Lamborghin­i’s Aventador S is an obvious example of “if you have to ask its price, you can’t afford it,” at $463,775.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada