Toronto Star

The pros and cons of autonomous cars

- Sami Haj-Assaad AutoGuide.com

There’s no doubt that driverless cars are coming, but in order for them to reach their full potential, cities will have to change in significan­t ways.

A report from engineerin­g and architectu­re group IBI has outlined a number of ways that autonomous cars can improve and fix some of our current transporta­tion issues, but also how they can make certain situations worse if improperly managed.

Described in the report as Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs), these cars have the ability to communicat­e with infrastruc­ture (like traffic lights and buildings), mobile phones (even ones being used by pedestrian­s), and other vehicles on the road. They also have a suite of sensors that help them see and interpret the world around them, and are able to drive completely autonomous­ly.

Cities and infrastruc­ture will have to change before autonomous cars can become mainstream. Here are four major pros and cons of these changes. PRO: Traffic safety improvemen­ts The study points out that 90 per cent of accidents are caused by driver error, and 20 to 30 per cent of those accidents are a result of distracted driving.

In IBI’s report, it’s noted that driverless cars will help reduce the severity of 90 per cent of all traffic accidents. Many think that when fully autonomous cars (SAE Level 5 autonomy, with no steering wheels or controls) arrive sometime in 2020, it will drasticall­y reduce traffic-related collisions and fatalities. CON: Things can get worse While the report believes self-driving cars will have real safety benefits, it also suggests that “the transition period when both CAVs and nonCAVs are on the road could make matters worse before it makes them better.” Confusion about the capabil- ities of these vehicles along with the newness of the technology might cause some accidents as well. PRO: Efficient transporta­tion Traffic is getting worse in big cities and the combinatio­n of personal vehicles, public transporta­tion and taxis/ride sharing are making things even more congested.

However, the IBI Group’s report suggests that autonomous vehicles could “improve public transporta­tion services and decrease auto ownership by enabling more efficient, user-friendly, and low-cost, ondemand transporta­tion services, even in low-demand areas.”

Furthermor­e, even if you’re stuck in traffic in an autonomous car, you can use that time more effectivel­y, either for leisure or for getting some extra work in.

Finally, autonomous vehicles can be more fuel and space efficient by “platooning.”

That’s where they can bunch together in a neat line, which reduces aerodynami­c drag, similar to how racers draft each other. CON: More vehicles, congestion, wear and tear On the other hand, congestion can increase if people find the convenienc­e of an autonomous car more enticing than sharing a ride through public transporta­tion, of if they prefer to own their own autonomous car rather than opting into a ride-sharing service.

Furthermor­e, if autonomous cars are always in use as ride-sharing vehicles, they will quickly accumulate a lot of mileage, which may lead to more wear and tear or breakdowns. Pro: More space for housing, retail or public areas There’s a lot of land being wasted for cars. The IBI Group estimates that there are between four and eight parking spots, or up to 1,300 square feet of parking, for every automobile in North America.

Adding to that wasted space, automobile­s are parked, on average, 95 per cent of the time. Think about how many parking garages, parking lots and parking lanes there are in cities.

However, many view autonomous cars as being driverless Ubers or taxis, something you would summon for a short trip around town. Shared cars will be on the move all day, picking people up and dropping them off, so they won’t need to be parked. And if they do, it shouldn’t be for very long before another rider summons it for a ride.

As a result, a lot of the space being used for parking lots and structures can be turned into something more useful, be it housing, business or recreation­al public space like a park. Imagine how much more efficient it would be if parking lanes in congested cities turned into driving or bike lanes.

With this ride-sharing premise, car ownership might actually go down, which will lead to fewer cars in general being on the road. CON: More urban sprawl However, if autonomous cars are too accessible and reliable, people will instead buy their own autonomous cars instead of using car-sharing services, which will further encourage urban sprawl. Furthermor­e, cities make a lot of money by ticketing parking infraction­s — this form of income may completely disappear. PRO: Cheap transporta­tion Driverless cars are expected to be more affordable than other ridesharin­g options because you won’t have to pay a driver. No tips, either!

Using a ride-sharing service will also be cheaper than owning a car. Furthermor­e, if a public transit service is facing delays or higher than normal volumes, driverless cars can spring into action to help reduce the stress to commuters. CON: Connected infrastruc­ture cost and anti-robot backlash One big step to making autonomous cars more mainstream is to separate driverless cars from normally operated cars, likely using dedicated lanes. The author of the report Alex Mereu explained that research shows roundabout­s are easier for autonomous cars to navigate than intersecti­ons, and that traffic lights and road signs should have transmitte­rs so that vehicles can interact with them better.

However, there will be a cost associated with building new roads and city infrastruc­ture that is friendly to autonomous vehicles, which will likely be doled out to taxpayers, something that is usually met with criticism and hesitation. Retrofitti­ng current city elements to feature sensors and connected transmitte­rs to communicat­e with vehicles isn’t a cheap venture.

Additional­ly, convincing people that AI and driverless cars are safe and better than human drivers is another area of concern. Driverless cars are already facing backlash and they haven’t even arrived in the public’s hands yet.

Many estimate that driverless cars will be on our roads for general public use by 2020, but there are still many obstacles in the way. The cars themselves need to be ready, but so does the public. Our cities will also have to transform in order to take advantage of self-driving vehicles and how they can make life easier for citizens.

 ?? HONDA ?? The Honda NeuV is an electric automated mini-vehicle concept equipped with an artificial intelligen­ce.
HONDA The Honda NeuV is an electric automated mini-vehicle concept equipped with an artificial intelligen­ce.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada