Toronto Star

Rethink before decriminal­izing drugs

-

If half a dozen deaths in Toronto last week were likely attributab­le to fatal opioid-related overdoses, how many do you think would have died if those drugs were legal? Fewer? I don’t see the logic in that. Easier access to drugs and no criminal liability wouldn’t discourage use, surely. And we’re not talking here about a mild mind-bending substance such as pot, which is to become decriminal­ized in Canada next year. Still stupid — dumbdownin­g of the populace . . . but it is the consensus will of the nation — because we seem to be just fine with the stupefying effect of “recreation­al” marijuana and hash despite all the evidence of young lives going off the rails when teenagers toked to the gills lose interest in school and sports and healthy activities.

There is a domino effect to falling in thrall with drugs. If you haven’t experience­d that reality in your own family, then you’re lucky, that’s all. Or maybe the people you love aren’t part of that sub-sect physiologi­cally and psychologi­cally susceptibl­e to addiction. Most users — 90 per cent, according to the literature — will never be addicted, but 10 per cent strikes me as a really high casualty demographi­c, no pun intended, and the legalizati­on argument gives those lost souls short shrift.

But it has made gazillions for the rehab industry.

Anyway, the subject isn’t dope. It’s exceedingl­y harmful psychoacti­ve substances such as fentanyl and heroin and methamphet­amines, the “hillbilly” version of H, which has seized America in its meth lab grip with heroin deaths tripling nationally since 2010.

Harm reduction is a fine philosophy. I wish it were that easy. All that money spent on law enforcemen­t and court procedures redirected to “safe” consumptio­n and drug education and health services. Empty out the jails in one fell swoop, turn the addled addicts loose on their own compulsion­s. Turn also a blind eye to the damage done on users and by users — upon their families, their neighbourh­oods, their communitie­s.

Go ahead and have the discussion, as Toronto’s medical officer of health urged at media briefing, the city reeling from some 80 overdose cases in hospital emergency in the last week of July. For most residents, that spate of drug wreckage had zero impact. Not so for front-line medical staff, including nurses who are often subjected to violence from the drug-crazed, and cops working at ground zero of the crisis, and neighbourh­oods such as mine swamped by drug crime.

At a bar patio a hundred yards from where I live, a gunman shot five people last week, leaving one dead and four wounded. Probably gangbanger related. And what business do you think street gangs are involved in?

None of that goes away with safe consumptio­n sites — of which there should be many more beyond the three supervised injection sites approved by city council. As long as every community bears its fair share and not just mine, which is already overrun with missions and shelters that turn out their bleary-eyed occupants — so many clearly mentally ill — every morning, leaving them to fare as best they can on the streets. Because everybody has to be somewhere and on occasion that somewhere is in a druginduce­d stupor beneath my back steps.

We’ve lost the “war on drugs” and now some want to make a tawdry peace with it, advocating for total decriminal­ization because public policy and law enforcemen­t have proven disastrous­ly ineffectiv­e.

Let’s talk about it, at least, perhaps rethink it, encouraged Dr. Eileen de Villa and board of health chair Councillor Joe Mihevc. “It’s clear that our current approach to drugs in this city and this country doesn’t seem to be having the desired impact,” de Villa observed.

Well, city officials can discuss it all they want, but drug legislatio­n is a federal matter and decriminal­izing all those toxic substances would be a bridge too far even for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. That approach may have had positive results in Portugal, often cited as a shining example of wise, evidence-based drug policy, where use is addressed as a medical issue under 2001reform­s. And it’s true, if you cherry- pick statistica­l data. But that same data shows a 40-per-cent increase in homicides related to drugs, even as overdose deaths have plunged. (Also, contrary to myth, drugs are still not legal in Portugal; those caught with drugs are hauled before a “commission for the dissuasion of drug addiction,” can be fined, placed in a compulsory treatment program and have their passport confiscate­d. But they won’t have a criminal record.)

As a municipal example, Oslo — Europe’s death overdose capital — monitors traffickin­g in the city’s go-to drug district around the docks and central train station, but police have essentiall­y adopted a no-arrest policy for the area. And it’s become a dangerous, crime-infested neighbourh­ood seeping its miseries outward. Ugly, sordid, a pustule of addiction, junkies like zombies.

This is the crucial flaw — and fallacy — in the drug decriminal­ization movement: Users still die, firsttimer­s and junkies. The criminal underbelly of traffickin­g hasn’t been remotely marginaliz­ed. Neighbourh­oods deluged by drugs are shot to hell.

In southern Ontario, the OxyContin frenzy isn’t being driven by prescripti­ons; the narcotic is a dealer’s nirvana.

I’ve no enthusiasm for tossing users behind bars. Criminal records are a terrible burden. Users are more to be pitied than punished — and yes, helped in all ways possible. But there has to be some disincenti­ve. Because it’s not just about self-harm and how to save their lives. It’s about the community’s pulse too, the body politic of the city and country in which we live, from the Downtown Eastside in Vancouver to the fringes of Moss Park in Toronto.

Mostly, I think, it’s about discouragi­ng young people from going down that road before they become hollow-eyed wretches, panhandlin­g — or selling their bodies — because they need, need, need.

Removing even the frayed leash of illegality is so irrational­ly and illogicall­y the wrong message for society to send.

I’ll catch you when you fall, but I won’t lure you to the edge. That’s junk-health. Rosie DiManno usually appears Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Saturday.

 ?? ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? Dr. Eileen de Villa says, “It’s clear that our current approach to drugs in this city and this country doesn’t seem to be having the desired impact."
ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO Dr. Eileen de Villa says, “It’s clear that our current approach to drugs in this city and this country doesn’t seem to be having the desired impact."
 ?? Rosie DiManno ??
Rosie DiManno

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada